On Tue, 3 May 2022 10:35:20 +0200
Méven wrote:
> I am guessing you are using cmake >= 3.16 so it allows you to run, but
> since the project does not have a cmake minimum, for others using
> cmake < 3.16 the build will break.
> This warning highlights it, so you inform your contributor they need
>
Hi,
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 16:09:51 +0200
Thierry Thomas wrote:
> I just upgraded RKWard to 0.7.3 (just locally, not yet in the ports
> tree), and the patch of FindR.cmake is no more necessary.
>
> It builds and installs clearly, but I noticed 2 problems:
>
> 1- the tests do not run:
>
> > source
Am Wed, 30 Mar 2022 17:55:12 +0200
schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier :
[...]
> What's troubling me more is that QWebEngineView (used, among other
> things, for Help->Help on RKWard) does not adapt to the color theme at
> all. I tried adding CSS rules (@media (prefers-color-scheme: da
An update and some questions:
Am Mon, 28 Mar 2022 15:39:55 +0200
schrieb Nicolas Fella :
[...]
> - Consider adding a color scheme selector (KColorSchemeManager) to the
> menu. On Windows that gives you dark mode support for free (this only
> really works nicely when using Breeze QStyle). See
> htt
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 17:09:44 +0200
Nicolas Fella wrote:
[...]
> Talking about FreeBSD: I started adding Gitlab CI and the FreeBSD
> build fails: https://invent.kde.org/education/rkward/-/jobs/274861,
> presumably due to having a different tar implementation than Linux.
Sweet!
> I'd appreciate if
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 00:09:38 +0200
Albert Astals Cid wrote:
[...]
> Results of running clang-tidy with some of my favorite options
> attached.
Thanks!
> The first group [bugprone-integer-division] seems an actual bug since
>double RKGraphicsDeviceFrontendTransmitter::lwdscale = 72/96;
> m
Hi,
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 15:39:55 +0200
Nicolas Fella wrote:
> I recently used RKWard for my Master Thesis, cool project!
thanks!
> A couple of observations:
>
> - CommitPolicy.txt still mentions Phabricator, that should point to
> Gitlab instead
Done.
> - CommitPolicy.txt mentions Ubuntu Tru
Hi!
KDE.org has been our home for a 7.5(!) years, now (after over a
decade on sourceforge), but we still haven't left playground... After a
lot of procrastination on that matter, a previous review failed due to
lack of time on my part. Sorry! Now, finally, I'd like to ask you to
start reviewing RK
Hi!
On Sun, 11 Oct 2020 11:47:58 +0200
David Faure wrote:
> If RKWard is being released, shouldn't it move out of playground?
Well, yes, it should. Embarrassingly, last time RKWard moved to
KDEreview, I went missing in the middle of the process.
It's definitely still on our list, though:
https:
Hi,
On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 06:59:53 +0200
Thomas Baumgart wrote:
> That's exactly how kate behaves. Using krunner to start it always
> creates a new instance. Using the 'Open with' option in dolphin opens
> the file in an existing instance. Or am I missing something? Maybe,
> you take a look at kate
meter "--reuse" to select the
desired behavior. But how to fit both into a single .desktop file?
Regards
Thomas
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 17:33, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 18:24:38 +0200
> > meik michalke wrote:
> > > how
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 18:24:38 +0200
meik michalke wrote:
> how would it affect our various PPAs if there was no debian/
> directory in the sources?
In fact, we'd have to keep the debian packaging somewhere, and "merge"
it into the sources while building (we do the same for translations in
the PPAs
Hi!
Thanks for your first feedback items. I'll try to respond to
everything, eventually, but I'm probably not going to be too fast.
(Albert: I'll get back to your items!)
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 11:21:05 +0100
Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> It installs two desktop files which creates duplicate menu entri
round.
Looking forward to your feedback!
Thomas Friedrichsmeier
for the RKWard team
pgpMAeppCXr4J.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi!
A co-developer recently pointed out that EU General Data Protection
Regulation (GDPR) is going to come into effect, soon (May 25th). To my
_very_ limited understanding, this will require privacy notices on all
websites. I see some kde.org sites already have one (e.g.
https://community.kde.org/
Hi,
sorry for the late reply.
On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 16:07:03 +0100
Dominik Haumann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 22:07:57 +0100
> > Dominik Haumann wrote:
> [...]
> >> Therefore, I would lik
Well, this thread is already split across two lists, so I'm
cross-replying...
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 22:07:57 +0100
Dominik Haumann wrote:
> I installed Qt 5.6.0 and MSVC 2015, and surprisingly Kate
> including all its dependencies compiled out of the box.
>
> I still see QStringLiteral fixes from
Hi!
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:46:03 +1300
Ben Cooksley wrote:
> We will be creating
> a mechanism which will allow repositories following certain naming
> conventions to be easily created by developers (although this will
> have to be done through the web interface).
And in another mail:
> That na
Hi,
sorry for a somewhat bitter tone, I find it a bit hard to avoid(*):
On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 11:37:48 +0100
Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> On Saturday 05 March 2016, Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > On Samstag, 5. März 2016 08:09:22 CEST, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
> > wrote:
> > > Q
Hi,
On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 09:58:34 +0100
Niels Ole Salscheider wrote:
> On Saturday, 5 March 2016, 08:09:22 CET, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
> > This is not only an uncomfortable situation for a free software
> > project to be in. If you're trying to interface with thir
Hi,
On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 10:35:23 +0100
Thomas Lübking wrote:
> On Samstag, 5. März 2016 08:09:22 CEST, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
> > QtWebEngine can _only_ be compiled using (free
> > as in beer) MSVC 2013. In particular, MinGW is explicitly _not_
> > supported.
>
Hi,
On Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:42:26 +0100
Milian Wolff wrote:
> Sorry, but how is "it takes long to compile" and argument for or
> against a piece of software if there is no feature equivalent
> alternative that takes less time to compile?
>
> Qt WebEngine is far easier to compile than Qt WebKit in
Hi,
On Wed, 09 Dec 2015 11:51:43 +0100
Jan Kundrát wrote:
[...]
> There is active work within the DMARC WG, with first drafts being
> published only *two months ago* [1]. My suggestion for everybody who
> doesn't have time to follow this process is to sit back, relax, and
> watch the IETF come up
Hi,
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 03:30:48 +0100
Thomas Lübking wrote:
> On Samstag, 24. Januar 2015 15:24:28 CET, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
> wrote:
>
> > But beyond review functionality, I think moving towards a more
> > integrated solution is clearly a step in the right direction,
Hi!
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:12:07 +1300
Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As promised in the earlier thread, i'd like to present the sysadmin
> report on the state of the infrastructure surrounding our code.
>
> It contains a detailed summary of what is broken with our existing
> systems, why ch
On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 13:19:45 +0100
Jan Kundrát wrote:
> On Monday, 5 January 2015 14:03:13 CEST, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
> > I think there is an easy test for this (well, not a real test, but a
> > useful initial heuristic): Can you explain exactly how to submit a
> > p
Hi,
On Mon, 05 Jan 2015 10:37:24 +0100
Jan Kundrát wrote:
> On Sunday, 4 January 2015 13:21:12 CEST, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
> > True, but don't forget about the other side of the story:
> > - potential contributors will have to learn more stuff, before they
&g
On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 00:37:49 +0100
Jan Kundrát wrote:
> My goal is to help bridge the gap between the existing project
> maintainers (who produce software in git trees) and the new
> contributors (who produce patches). If we can offload the management
> of git trees to the contributors, then the f
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 16:19:37 -0500
"Jeff Mitchell" wrote:
> On 29 Dec 2014, at 15:20, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
> > I am absolutely not qualified to comment on the pain this is
> > causing to
> > you sysadmins. But are we talking about / is the problem inher
Hi,
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 14:41:03 -0500
"Jeff Mitchell" wrote:
> I just want to point out that scratch repos may be useful to some
> people, but are also the easiest repo type for anyone to host
> anywhere, including on their own local filesystem. The concept was a
> bit flawed from the beginning
Hi,
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 12:13:38 -0500
"Jeff Mitchell" wrote:
> On 29 Dec 2014, at 11:36, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> > I agree with scratch repos being useful as a first step.
>
> Except nobody deletes it. That's a large problem. Scratch is nice in
> concept but it's a sysadmin nightmare.
>
> Out of
Hi,
On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 13:21:37 +0100
Milian Wolff wrote:
> Here's a list of things that I'd like to have for my workflow, which
> is basically two folded: On one hand, I actively develop new software
> and new features. On the other hand, I spent a considerable amount of
> KDE time reviewing ot
On Thu, 25 Dec 2014 20:21:05 +1300
Ben Cooksley wrote:
[...]
> > 1) Everybody can create, delete and force-push to all branches
> > except the "reserved" ones (kde/*, master, stable,... see the list).
> >
> > 2) People are free to create, delete and force-push to all branches
> > below my/$usernam
Hi!
On Wed, 24 Dec 2014 14:11:46 +1300
Ben Cooksley wrote:
> That brings the list of protected branches requested thus far to:
>
> master
> frameworks
> KDE/*
> Applications/*
> Plasma/*
> Calligra/*
>
> Any others?
Extragear apps may have different names for release series branches. For
RKWar
-- Note: Reposting to follow Dominik's example of CCing kde-core-devel --
Hi,
On Wednesday 23 May 2012, Milian Wolff wrote:
> We have port Kate away from QtScript.
I'm not sure, whether this is a serious suggestion, or just a way to catch
attention. In the latter case: it worked. In the former
Hi,
I'll start with the bottom of your mail, and only add some clarifications after
that.
On Saturday 19 November 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> so .. to summarize:
>
> * k-c-d needs more active guidance, and that guidance needs the support of
> core members of the community
>
> * decisions nee
Hi,
I don't want to play the blame-game. But I'm really worried about this
tendency to take essential discussions to side-channels. So I'm sorry to
continue on one of those another lengthy meta discussions.
On Saturday 19 November 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Thursday, November 17, 2011 18:
On Wednesday 16 November 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> In case someone is interested since it has never mentioned in this list,
> there is a frameworks mailing list at kde-frameworks-devel
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
So why have this discussion on a separate lis
Hi,
On Monday 14 November 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> besides kde-core-devel, it was also blogged by a number of attendees, so
> planetkde.org readership was in the loop. there was a story on dot.kde.org,
> so dot.kde.org readership was in the loop. there's documentation on
> community.kde.org
ttp://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101653/diff/diff
Testing
---
Thanks,
Thomas Friedrichsmeier
ffs (updated)
-
kparts/statusbarextension.h 69691d7
kparts/statusbarextension.cpp 11fdf40
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101653/diff/diff
Testing
---
Thanks,
Thomas Friedrichsmeier
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102632/
---
Review request for kdelibs, David Faure and Clarence Dang.
Summary
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101653/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Summary
---
I guess this one needs some e
On Monday 06 June 2011, David Faure wrote:
> About the second question, here's my commit log for 60ae8626e917cb1f3:
>
> Re-route the old actions "Find Text as You Type" and "Find Links as You
> Type" to the findbar. Remove them from the menu, since they are redundant
> with "Find text", but ke
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101491/
---
Review request for kdelibs and David Faure.
Summary
---
Shortcut cont
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/4126/#review6354
---
On 2010-06-01 07:15:25, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
>
> -
46 matches
Mail list logo
