Hi, On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 18:04:45 +0100 Jonathan Riddell <j...@jriddell.org> wrote: > I added it into Neon > https://packaging.neon.kde.org/neon-packaging/rkward.git/ > https://build.neon.kde.org/view/1%20release%20⛰/job/bionic_release_neon-packaging_rkward/
thanks! > It's the norm for Debian packages to have their packaging kept > separate from the upstream source including for PPAs, keeping them > together is quite confusing. Ok, will do. It may take me a while, though, as I'll have to be careful not to break our automated builds on our Ubuntu PPAs (as pointed out by Meik). But ideally, I'd also like to combine this step with handing over our official debian packaging (i.e. the "debian-official" folder) to the debian qt/kde-team. Is there any hope for that, or what can I do to make that happen? > QGuiApplication should include ability for single instance application > rather than having separate .desktop files for it. Not quite what we want. Having several instances is quite ok (one for each of several "projects"), _except_ that's very unlikely to be the thing a user wants when selecting to open several .R-files (all files should go into the same "project"). So what we are looking for is: 1. When invoking RKWard from the Application Menu, always start a new instance. 2. When invoking RKWard from Open With..., always open the file in an existing RKWard instance (if any). We already have a command line parameter "--reuse" to select the desired behavior. But how to fit both into a single .desktop file? Regards Thomas > On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 17:33, Thomas Friedrichsmeier > <thomas.friedrichsme...@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 18:24:38 +0200 > > meik michalke <meik.micha...@uni-duesseldorf.de> wrote: > > > how would it affect our various PPAs if there was no debian/ > > > directory in the sources? > > > > In fact, we'd have to keep the debian packaging somewhere, and > > "merge" it into the sources while building (we do the same for > > translations in the PPAs, so the procedure itself is pretty clear). > > But we only need the "sloppy" variant of the packaging for this > > purpose (i.e. the one that just works, without trying to keep up > > the latest debhelper compatibility levels, and such; "debian" > > instead of "debian-official"). > > > > Regards > > Thomas
pgpHvTlGz8RUN.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
