https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=434603
--- Comment #8 from Michael Miller ---
I am planning on rewriting the facial recognition documentation as part of the
upcoming 8.5.0 release. There will be a section on best practices for "How to
train your digiKam". I hope this will help a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436544
--- Comment #10 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Gilles,
Yes. I will probably close this issue when I finish my testing. The results
have been very good with the new AI models, and I don't think this will be a
problem in 8.5.0.
Cheers,
Mike
--
Yo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470018
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version Fixed In||8.5.0
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447767
--- Comment #21 from Michael Miller ---
I shoot Sony (a7R III). The new facial detection and recognition AI models in
8.5.0 are working perfectly for me.
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485992
--- Comment #15 from Michael Miller ---
Gilles,
Are we including OpenCV in the Windows package or requiring the end user to
install it? Is this why we had to put the OpenCV 4.10.0 check in?
Andy,
YuNet and SFace require OpenCV version 4.10.0 or
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444160
--- Comment #48 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Jonathan,
How is working for you now? Please let us know the results, and if you think
we can close this issue.
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495540
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425981
--- Comment #7 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #6)
> Why to close this one. Limiting the face recognition by tags already exists ?
I think this is another suggestion to improve recognition results by limiting
the l
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487004
--- Comment #6 from Michael Miller ---
Hi rogstr,
Thank you for the reply. It's great news you like the improvements we've made
in 8.5.0.
Keep the suggestions coming!
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watchi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495540
--- Comment #4 from Michael Miller ---
Thank you.
I'm going to keep this ticket open to remind me to look at NASNet when I start
updating the auto-tagging recognition models.
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watchin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444160
--- Comment #49 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Jonathan,
Any feedback for us? How is it working? How can we improve?
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487004
--- Comment #4 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to roqstr from comment #2)
> Re Point 2: That's not what I meant. I want to be able to apply the filter
> before running the face-recognition, not afterwards. So that the face
> sugges
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472416
--- Comment #3 from Michael Miller ---
Gilles, I think we can close this, unless we want to keep it as a suggestion
for when we rewrite the face pipeline.
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495985
--- Comment #2 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #1)
> You want a statistics? A bar chart? Because such queries are already
> possible. I just checked, I only have 1239 images under 30mm focal length,
> so a wide
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495985
Bug ID: 495985
Summary: Feature idea: Image metadata analytics
Classification: Applications
Product: digikam
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS: Other
Status: REP
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485992
--- Comment #23 from Michael Miller ---
Gilles,
I think we can close this.
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491042
--- Comment #18 from Michael Miller ---
Created attachment 173842
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=173842&action=edit
Latest errors
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491042
--- Comment #20 from Michael Miller ---
I'm still getting errors when I launch digiKam with a fresh install.
https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=173842
Steps to reproduce:
1. Install latest digiKam-8.5.0-20240918T163828-Qt6-MacOS-arm64
2. d
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441643
--- Comment #9 from Michael Miller ---
I'm unable to reproduce the issue with 8.5.0 pre-release on MacOS Sonoma
14.6.1.
@Harald, are you able to reproduce the issue with the new pre-release version?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402346
--- Comment #13 from Michael Miller ---
Gilles and Maik,
Should we be using QStandardPaths::AppConfigLocation instead of
QStandardPaths::GenericConfigLocation?
>From the Qt docs:
> QStandardPaths::GenericConfigLocation Returns a directory lo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467505
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491042
--- Comment #14 from Michael Miller ---
Created attachment 173821
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=173821&action=edit
digiKam initial run
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491042
--- Comment #15 from Michael Miller ---
Created attachment 173822
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=173822&action=edit
more error info
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491042
--- Comment #21 from Michael Miller ---
michmill@Michaels-Virtual-Machine ~ %
/Applications/digiKam.org/digikam.app/Contents/MacOS/digikam
digikam.widgets: Breeze icons resource file found
digikam.general: Qt standard translations removed: 0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491042
--- Comment #23 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #22)
> MariaDB appears to be installed in:
>
> /Applications/digiKam.org/digikam.app/Contents/lib/mariadb/bin/mariadbd
>
> MariaDB appears to be compiled w
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491040
--- Comment #9 from Michael Miller ---
Thanks. I've been using it in my Homebrew build for a while now. It works
well. Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491040
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491040
--- Comment #10 from Michael Miller ---
I marked the issue as resolved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491042
--- Comment #3 from Michael Miller ---
Have you tried to do a SQLite to MariaDB database migration with 8.5.0 Arm64?
I haven't tried with Macports yet, but with Homebrew I can't do a migration. I
can use MariaDB when I initially confi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491042
--- Comment #8 from Michael Miller ---
Maik and Giles,
>Another question is whether the MariaDB directory is complete (including data
>folders).
This is what I saw with 8.4.0. Several files were missing to initialize
MariaDB, including setup s
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491042
--- Comment #9 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Gilles and Maik,
New Homebrew MariaDB bundling is waiting for MR approval. There's more cleanup
that could be done to reduce the final package size, but this works well. The
MariaDB install is also por
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469178
--- Comment #4 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Andy,
Were you able to test the "Extra Small" faces option? Did it find all the
faces?
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435367
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496131
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495985
--- Comment #4 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #3)
> (In reply to Michael Miller from comment #2)
> > Where does this exist in digiKam now? How did I miss it? I've been looking
> > for this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496380
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444160
--- Comment #52 from Michael Miller ---
> It is extremely good now. Thanks for the
Wunderbar! Danke, dass Sie mir das mitgeteilt haben.
There are significant improvements coming in 8.6.0, too. The pipelines have
been completely rewritten and are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395241
--- Comment #33 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Michael Moore from comment #32)
> > [Mike] If you're willing to try very unstable code, grab the latest
> > AppImage and let's see if we can reproduce the issue. If we can,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498109
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version Fixed In||8.6.0
Latest Commit
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495540
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498024
--- Comment #15 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #14)
> Did you recommend to increase the OpenCV minimal version to 4.10 as
> dependencies, to prevent this kind of dysfunction in the future?
>
> Gilles
I
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498024
--- Comment #17 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #16)
> Perhaps asking to the OpenCV project forum is the simpler solution...
>
> https://forum.opencv.org/
>
> Gilles
We need a minimum of OpenCV 4.8
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498320
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498024
--- Comment #22 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to haselnuss87 from comment #21)
> Hello Mike, I am facing the same issue as René. First, SFace worked
> significantly better after training a few faces. The more faces I trained
> though,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498024
--- Comment #25 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #24)
> Hi Maik,
>
> Tom1 and Tom2 will have 2 fingerprints in the database if Tom1 != Tom2.
>
> Of course if Tom1 == Tom2, what's will be
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498024
--- Comment #6 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #5)
> A request has just arrived on the mailing list, which suggests that the
> OpenCV Debian packages are broken. I'll make a connection here.
>
> htt
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395241
--- Comment #38 from Michael Miller ---
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UWhkx3GjoA
>
> After the images are found and added to the album there are a total of 10
> thumbnails.
>
> Accessing People > Michael, viewing the pre
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497938
--- Comment #5 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to chair-tweet-decal from comment #4)
> Indeed, the fact that it's Python might complicate things. It would likely
> be possible to export the model to ONNX, but that would require
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395241
--- Comment #29 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Michael Moore from comment #28)
> > Can you provide the specs of your system? How fast is the CPU, what kind
> > of storage (local SSD, network share, etc...), and probably most
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497938
--- Comment #3 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to chair-tweet-decal from comment #2)
> The CLIP model works locally, so there’s no need for an external system.
> CLIP is used in Stable Diffusion, so I assume its license would allow its
&g
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497938
--- Comment #7 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #6)
> Hi Michael,
>
> I'm not favorable to mix different programing language in digiKam. This will
> increase the entropy and make the maintenance a hel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395241
--- Comment #26 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Michael Moore from comment #25)
> Hi Gilles,
>
> For me the UI remains responsive. I can change away from the current People
> tab at any time without any lag.
>
> I'm no
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395241
--- Comment #35 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #34)
> @Michael, When creating thumbnails in the face pipeline, we need to make
> sure that we already have the thumbnail in the Thumbnail DB before saving
> th
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459499
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOT A BUG
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497567
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
Status
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444160
--- Comment #54 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to José Oliver-Didier from comment #53)
> I would like to add, I am quite impressed with the 8.5.0 face detection and
> recognition. Looking forward to 8.6!
Thank you, José. We are happy you li
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498024
--- Comment #11 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #10)
> Hi all,
>
> Look to the OpenCV change log :
>
> https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/OpenCV-Change-Logs
>
> Q to Michael : accordingly to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499305
--- Comment #11 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to pascal lacroix from comment #10)
> crash with this bt, if that could help :
>
> [Thread 0x7fff47e006c0 (LWP 940122) exited]
> UNKNOWN neural network model
>
> Thread 1 "d
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499305
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit||https://invent.kde.org/grap
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498024
--- Comment #28 from Michael Miller ---
> What is the correct method to retrain the face system?
To retrain the face DB, go to Tools->Maintenance->Detect and Recognize Faces.
Select "Rebuild all training data" only.
Cheers
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499156
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version Fixed In||8.6.0
Latest Commit|https
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499172
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Version Fixed In
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498320
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Version Fixed In
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499301
--- Comment #6 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Roland from comment #4)
> Hi-
>
> Im not sure if there was a fix on this published or not. I say this because
> I have 2 instances of digiKam, and with the update in place, one instance
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498024
--- Comment #30 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Craig from comment #29)
> > To retrain the face DB, go to Tools->Maintenance->Detect and Recognize
> > Faces. Select "Rebuild all training data" only.
>
> Than
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499616
--- Comment #10 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Daniel from comment #8)
> So this description could be forwarded to the maintainer of the help
> documentation.
> Maybe it could be adapted to the database settings section ...
>
&g
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499616
--- Comment #6 from Michael Miller ---
> Hi Mike
>
> One reason is the work on different projects. It's important for me to
> separate the projects to prevent from mixed data.
> As examples:
> Face recognization data must
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499616
--- Comment #7 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Daniel from comment #5)
> As you may have noticed, I've created two databases now:
> - 1 for a drive
> - 1 for a network drive
>
> I did this the following way:
> 1. I'
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499616
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432388
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435868
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425981
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Version Fixed In
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472266
--- Comment #7 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Justin,
Can you confirm this is fixed for you?
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496368
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472416
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495608
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415777
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version Fixed In||8.6.0
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=475488
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version Fixed In||8.6.0
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470694
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497491
--- Comment #17 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Michael Miller from comment #16)
> (In reply to tab from comment #15)
> > Created attachment 176819 [details]
> > Result after new Training
>
> Hi TAB,
> Thanks for t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425263
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version Fixed In||8.6.0
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499230
--- Comment #3 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Yoel,
I don't think the new autotagging models in 8.6.0 will help, sorry. The models
are general object detection and image classification models, and aren't made
for detecting textures. I'm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497151
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
Status
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443827
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=434603
--- Comment #13 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Craig from comment #12)
> Created attachment 176589 [details]
> attachment-2736658-0.html
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 at 05:41, Michael Miller
> wrote:
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488562
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
Status
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=480748
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
Status
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488237
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
Status
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476120
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366559
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499156
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499301
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497491
--- Comment #6 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #4)
> I understand the bug report to mean that it is about the face detection
> itself, because too many objects are detected as faces that are not. So the
> user
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497491
--- Comment #9 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to tab from comment #8)
> Created attachment 176661 [details]
> Example after Face dedection.
>
> In this case I have 105 Confirmed Enteries.
> Dedection Face 1 is correct, 2,3,4 are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497491
--- Comment #11 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to tab from comment #10)
> Hi Mike,
> yes, I’m using YuNet and SFace in digiKam 8.5.0.
> I’ve also experimented with the two options under “Extras/Maintenance/Face
> Detection.”
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497491
--- Comment #13 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to tab from comment #12)
> Yes, Mick, that's exactly what I'm looking for: "Rebuild all training data".
> I noticed thumbnails of "good" faces on the bottom right dur
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497264
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit||https://invent.kde.org/grap
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497264
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=434603
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444394
--- Comment #13 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Chris D from comment #12)
> I have been using 8.5 for a couplea weeks, and it is MUCH improved, so
> thanks to everyone for the hard work. Many more faces in my collection have
> been i
101 - 200 of 294 matches
Mail list logo
