https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363006
--- Comment #4 from John A. Ward ---
Created attachment 103413
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=103413&action=edit
New crash information added by DrKonqi
kwin_x11 (5.7.5) using Qt 5.6.2
- What I was doing when the application crash
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363006
John A. Ward changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@mbstemps.com
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493554
--- Comment #9 from John A. Ward ---
(In reply to Bug Janitor Service from comment #8)
> 🐛🧹 ⚠️ This bug has been in NEEDSINFO status with no change for at least 15
> days. Please provide the requested information, then set the bug sta
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493554
John A. Ward changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.27.11 |6.2.2
--- Comment #12 from John A. Ward
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493554
Bug ID: 493554
Summary: Icons move AFTER being Locked.
Classification: Plasma
Product: plasmashell
Version: git-stable-Plasma/5.27
Platform: Fedora RPMs
OS: Linux
Stat
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493554
--- Comment #1 from John A. Ward ---
Created attachment 174007
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=174007&action=edit
showing icons moving
Screens before, and at next day, and next day
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493554
--- Comment #3 from John A. Ward ---
Do you need any further information, why anyone would mandate a move to Wayland
when it doesn't work is beyond me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493554
--- Comment #5 from John A. Ward ---
Mr. Graham,
I did the upgrade from the Fedora site from Fedora 39 to Fedora 40, so I got
whatever Red Hat - Fedora is distributing. What should I do to make the system
supportable? I did what I normally do to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493554
--- Comment #6 from John A. Ward ---
Mr. Graham,
I didn't mention that I used the DNF method, somebody should look into that. It
sounds like DNF didn't replace KDE with the new version?
John
> On 10/01/2024 3:03 PM EDT John A
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482875
John A. Ward changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@mbstemps.com
--- Comment #32 from John A
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493554
--- Comment #15 from John A. Ward ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #2)
> How did you manage to get Plasma 5.27 on Fedora KDE 40?
Nate, as I wrote earlier, my fault I looked at a fedora 39 computer, the Fedora
40 is currently 6.2.3
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493554
John A. Ward changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|6.2.2 |6.2.3
--- Comment #16 from John A. Ward
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493554
--- Comment #14 from John A. Ward ---
I have been doing updates basically every day, the KDE version is 6.2.3 and the
problem is still there. There was a message that the problem has been solved
in Version 6.3.x, is Fedora going to include the update
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456808
John A. Ward changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@mbstemps.com
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456808
--- Comment #13 from John A. Ward ---
I found a solution, the device wasn't scaned by the scanning program, when I
called it from Libreoffice it worked fine.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497964
Bug ID: 497964
Summary: skanlie says invalid option?
Classification: Applications
Product: Skanlite
Version: 23.08.5
Platform: Fedora RPMs
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497145
Bug ID: 497145
Summary: crash when pressing the 'scan' button
Classification: Applications
Product: Skanlite
Version: 23.08.5
Platform: Fedora RPMs
OS: Linux
Status: R
17 matches
Mail list logo
