https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417187
Petar Jovanovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417187
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #21 from Mark Wielaa
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417187
--- Comment #20 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Stefan Maksimovic from comment #19)
> We'll land the changes if you don't mind.
>
> One question though, do you happen to know the exact date of the code freeze?
> In order for us to know by which dat
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417187
--- Comment #19 from Stefan Maksimovic ---
We'll land the changes if you don't mind.
One question though, do you happen to know the exact date of the code freeze?
In order for us to know by which date we need to commit the patches.
--
You are receivi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417187
--- Comment #18 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Stefan Maksimovic from comment #17)
> Created attachment 126749 [details]
> handle branches in delay slots
>
> The result is that valgrind now mimics the behaviour of a program by
> emitting a SIGILL i
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417187
--- Comment #17 from Stefan Maksimovic ---
Created attachment 126749
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=126749&action=edit
handle branches in delay slots
We've taken a second look at the possible scenarios you described and updated
the curren
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417187
--- Comment #16 from Julian Seward ---
Hi Stefan,
Thank you for the analyses, patches and testing. Overall, your
solutions look good to me. I have just one question, regarding
this patch:
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mips: Treat delay slot as part of prev
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417187
--- Comment #15 from Stefan Maksimovic ---
We tested these changes a couple of days ago on a number of mips32/mips64
development boards and found no regressions present as of now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug change
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417187
--- Comment #14 from Stefan Maksimovic ---
Created attachment 126546
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=126546&action=edit
branch special case patch
Another update:
Analyzing the mips and the x86 debug output side by side we noticed the
foll
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417187
--- Comment #13 from Stefan Maksimovic ---
Created attachment 126427
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=126427&action=edit
cdebug_zlib main fn logs, w/ and w/o frame ptr used
Another observation:
Modifying the main function of memcheck/tests
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417187
Stefan Maksimovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #125692|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417187
--- Comment #11 from Stefan Maksimovic ---
Created attachment 126200
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=126200&action=edit
Newly proposed solution pt 2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417187
Stefan Maksimovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #125689|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417187
--- Comment #9 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Stefan Maksimovic from comment #8)
> > We pretty much agree with your analysis [..]
Good!
So .. last Sunday, in discussion at Fosdem, one of the three of you
(not sure who) suggested that this might b
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417187
--- Comment #8 from Stefan Maksimovic ---
(In reply to Stefan Maksimovic from comment #7)
> Thank you for your reply, Julian.
>
> We pretty much agree with your analysis of the initial SB sequence as well as
> the first and second speculative disassemb
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417187
--- Comment #7 from Stefan Maksimovic ---
Thank you for your reply, Julian.
We pretty much agree with your analysis of the initial SB sequence as well as
the first and second speculative disassembly.
A note for the first speculative disassembly: you g
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417187
--- Comment #6 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Stefan Maksimovic from comment #4)
> Created attachment 125693 [details]
> test program log with grail changes
Thank you for the attachments. Let me see if I understand what you are
saying. In this lo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417187
--- Comment #5 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Stefan Maksimovic from comment #0)
> Created attachment 125689 [details]
> enable_grail_mips.diff
Just as a tiny comment on this patch, and not related to the main problem here:
the patch looks reasona
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417187
Petar Jovanovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mips3...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417187
Stefan Maksimovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #125691|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417187
Stefan Maksimovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #125690|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417187
--- Comment #1 from Stefan Maksimovic ---
Created attachment 125690
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=125690&action=edit
test program log without grail changes
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417187
--- Comment #2 from Stefan Maksimovic ---
Created attachment 125691
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=125691&action=edit
test program log with grail changes
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
23 matches
Mail list logo
