https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394775
Hrtmt Brng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hbrnng.sw_...@mailbox.org
--
You are receiving th
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394775
--- Comment #20 from ederag ---
> I'm not clear why you would want the pdf file always non-writable?
Because many of these pdf are no longer available, and I don't want any
corruption risk.
> Perhaps you have simultaneous multiple users viewing and a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394775
--- Comment #19 from Andrew Norton ---
(In reply to ederag from comment #18)
> Did I read correctly that the pdf files have to be writable, and thus
> temporarily modified,
> which I don't want (I want a pure viewer) ?
The Python script (annotation-mg
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394775
--- Comment #18 from ederag ---
I have not been able to fix the issues mentioned in comment #16,
because the annotation saving into the pdf is deeply entangled with annotation
handling in general now.
It might be doable, but would be a huge change, and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394775
Andrew Norton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||norton...@gmail.com
--- Comment #17 from Andrew
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394775
--- Comment #16 from ederag ---
Good news: an experimental helper script seems to workaround our use case.
(there are issues, it's not ready to share yet)
It required a two line hack (not satisfying yet) to okular,
so that the archive holds the original
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394775
--- Comment #15 from ederag ---
(In reply to David Hurka from comment #14)
> So if you let a document be reviewed by multiple reviewers, ...
> it would be useful to export all annotations ...
> and import them into another document.
> ... would that he
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394775
David Hurka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.kde.org/show_b
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394775
--- Comment #14 from David Hurka ---
>From the real world I can name another use case for separated XML files now. I
just sent a PDF with some questions added to a teacher. So if you let a
document be reviewed by multiple reviewers, or send it to studen
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394775
--- Comment #13 from David Hurka ---
(In reply to ederag from comment #12)
> okular part.cpp was very readable (as often with kde code),
> and docdata capability is still around (for archives).
> That opens other possibilities.
>
> A workaround might b
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394775
--- Comment #12 from ederag ---
Thanks for the tip, xournal improved a lot!
Yet xournalpp is fine for few pages, but currently slow to open books.
(tested with a 56MB, 500 pages long pdf,
xournalpp versions 1.0.8 and current master: 4d2e2fb)
Developme
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394775
--- Comment #11 from David Hurka ---
I just remembered about Xournal. It’s a notetaking application, which can use
PDFs as background. I never used it, and I’m not sure how much this paragraph
applies to Xournal, but:
> Fileformat
> The fileformat *.xo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394775
--- Comment #10 from ederag ---
(In reply to David Hurka from comment #9)
> * Drawings with popup note: I don’t think that makes sense.
Here is my use case for that:
highlight a sentence in orange to mean "there's an issue here",
and give details in th
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394775
--- Comment #9 from David Hurka ---
If I understand it correctly, you want to make local notes on a remote PDF
file. (Or similar to that, where the “remote PDF” is on your local machine.)
There are some types of annotations:
* Notes: You spot an interes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394775
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé ---
To summarise my situation: Actually I am still using Okular 1.3. I am reading
and annotating a lot of PDFs for my work, any newer version of Okular would
completely break my workflow. I need the original P
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394775
--- Comment #7 from Ambrogio De Lorenso ---
(In reply to ederag from comment #6)
> Version 1.2.
> Okular is too good to move away from ! A package for openSUSE can be found in
> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:ederag/okular-1.2
Actually I u
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394775
ederag changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ed...@gmx.fr
--- Comment #6 from ederag ---
(In reply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394775
Ambrogio De Lorenso changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ogio.s...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from A
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394775
Sebastian Guttenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wurscht...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394775
kamp changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kamp0...@arcor.de
--- Comment #3 from kamp ---
I am mis
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394775
Christoph Feck changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de...@the-user.org
--- Comment #2 from Christo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394775
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aa...@kde.org
Status|UNCONFIRME
22 matches
Mail list logo
