https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394775
--- Comment #7 from Ambrogio De Lorenso <ogio.s...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to ederag from comment #6) > Version 1.2. > Okular is too good to move away from ! A package for openSUSE can be found in > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:ederag/okular-1.2 Actually I use okular 1.9.3 1.2 is too old. Maybe a lot of new functionality in PDF compatibility could be lost with it. > > > Another description of use cases: in the last paragraph of > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397097#c2 > and in > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397097#c3 > > > An interface design was proposed in > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397097#c8 > what do you think ? > > > I'm ready to help implementing it, > although my c++ is rusty and the task is daunting. > Discussion and pointers would be appreciated. All job that can permit to leave untouched the original file, but that can permit to annotate on the PDF is really usefull. There are a lot of cases that cannot permit to modify the original doc. A second copy, modified with annotations, is not so simple to be used and maintained. I think developers should evaluate our point of view, and decide if it is possible to return to previous behaviour. Regards Ambrogio -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
