https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496020
--- Comment #10 from Carlos De Maine ---
(In reply to dofficialgman from comment #9)
> Huh... Not sure what part of my previous comments were poorly worded opinion
> since debian guidelines say that a renamed package should have a breaks and
> replaces
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496020
--- Comment #9 from dofficialg...@gmail.com ---
Huh... Not sure what part of my previous comments were poorly worded opinion
since debian guidelines say that a renamed package should have a breaks and
replaces for the old name
https://wiki.debian.org/Ren
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496020
Carlos De Maine changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496020
--- Comment #7 from dofficialg...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Carlos De Maine from comment #6)
> correct. the packaging has been broken since the upgrade to noble when
> ubuntu/upstream changed it's packaging.
No. This is a neon specific problem. Neithe
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496020
Carlos De Maine changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||carlosd@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from Car
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496020
dofficialg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|CONFIRMED
--- Comment #5 from dofficia
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496020
dofficialg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496020
Antonio Rojas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dav...@tutamail.com
--- Comment #3 from Antonio
ave been stable and so it doesn’t make sense to
allow this globally."
09.11.2024, 14:52, "Antonio Rojas"
:
To: gerar...@yandex.com (gerar...@yandex.com);
Subject: [neon] [Bug 496020] Package “libkpim5gapi5-data” failed to
upgrade.;
htt
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496020
gerar...@yandex.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496020
Antonio Rojas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@jriddell.org,
|
11 matches
Mail list logo