https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105459
--- Comment #12 from Christoph Cullmann ---
(In reply to Roc Vallès from comment #11)
> > Without any hint, it will even be more confusing.
> > Why shall I not write into that buffer?
>
> All I am reading is that adding such a hint would resolve any po
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105459
--- Comment #11 from Roc Vallès ---
> Without any hint, it will even be more confusing.
> Why shall I not write into that buffer?
All I am reading is that adding such a hint would resolve any possible
confusion.
Which is, in any event, a separate issu
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105459
Christoph Cullmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INTENTIONAL
Status|REOPENED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105459
Roc Vallès changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INTENTIONAL
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105459
--- Comment #8 from Christoph Cullmann ---
Yeah, I am not sure how helpful this is, either.
You can save the file with a different file name, you can just want to type
stuff there and not even save ever.
To auto make such files read-only will just be ex
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105459
Waqar Ahmed changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105459
Roc Vallès changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INTENTIONAL |---
Ever confirmed|0
