https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105459
--- Comment #12 from Christoph Cullmann <cullm...@kde.org> --- (In reply to Roc Vallès from comment #11) > > Without any hint, it will even be more confusing. > > Why shall I not write into that buffer? > > All I am reading is that adding such a hint would resolve any possible > confusion. > > Which is, in any event, a separate issue. > > Read-only mode does already exist, so this issue does already exist. It > would just become more prominent as we'd see read-only mode enabled more > often. > > That's about it from me; Annoying as this issue is, it is not a hill worth > dying on. Yeah, we have read-only mode, but actually more or less only because that was required to be an read-only component. We use that normally nowhere automatically. And as said, the current behavior is consistent with what other popular editors do, therefore I fail to see why we should alter this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
