[kajongg] [Bug 486171] Doesn't actually work with Qt 6

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486171 --- Comment #20 from Andreas Sturmlechner --- (In reply to Wolfgang Rohdewald from comment #19) > Right. That patch is not needed. It is. Otherwise we're back to: $ kajongg Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/kajongg", line 19, in

[kajongg] [Bug 486171] Doesn't actually work with Qt 6

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486171 --- Comment #19 from Wolfgang Rohdewald --- Right. That patch is not needed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[kajongg] [Bug 486171] Doesn't actually work with Qt 6

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486171 --- Comment #18 from Andreas Sturmlechner --- (In reply to Wolfgang Rohdewald from comment #16) > I committed a possible fix. But without seeing the backtrace I can only > guess. Your original fix (attached patch in this bug) is still missing. -- You

[kajongg] [Bug 486171] Doesn't actually work with Qt 6

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486171 --- Comment #17 from Andreas Sturmlechner --- If you ask me, keeping Qt5 support is adding complexity for no gain. I doubt any distribution is going to package kajongg-24.08 as Qt5-based. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bu

[kajongg] [Bug 486171] Doesn't actually work with Qt 6

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486171 --- Comment #16 from Wolfgang Rohdewald --- I committed a possible fix. But without seeing the backtrace I can only guess. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[kajongg] [Bug 486171] Doesn't actually work with Qt 6

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486171 --- Comment #15 from Andreas Sturmlechner --- Change from downstream reporter: https://bugs.gentoo.org/939423#c6 > Not sure if this correct but I added sip_cast to `else` block too > --- > else: > def sip_cast(obj, _type): >"""hide not so n

[kajongg] [Bug 486171] Doesn't actually work with Qt 6

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486171 --- Comment #14 from Antonio Rojas --- Before the patch, it works for me (with PySide6) if PyQt6-sip is installed (no need to have PyQt6 itself). After the patch, I get the same backtrace as Andreas with or without PyQt6-sip -- You are receiving this

[kajongg] [Bug 486171] Doesn't actually work with Qt 6

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486171 --- Comment #13 from Andreas Sturmlechner --- And just to make sure: no problems as soon as QtPy was built with PyQt6 support -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[kajongg] [Bug 486171] Doesn't actually work with Qt 6

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486171 --- Comment #12 from Andreas Sturmlechner --- (In reply to Wolfgang Rohdewald from comment #11) > You are right. Does the patch I just added fix it? Testing this myself right now, it does get further than before, but ends up with: > C: * Kajongg is n

[kajongg] [Bug 486171] Doesn't actually work with Qt 6

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486171 --- Comment #11 from Wolfgang Rohdewald --- You are right. Does the patch I just added fix it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[kajongg] [Bug 486171] Doesn't actually work with Qt 6

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486171 --- Comment #10 from Wolfgang Rohdewald --- Created attachment 173534 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=173534&action=edit Patch for running with Pyside -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[kajongg] [Bug 486171] Doesn't actually work with Qt 6

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486171 --- Comment #9 from Antonio Rojas --- > The kajongg source code he points to sets HAVE_SIP to False if neither PyQt6 > nor PyQt5 is found. No, it sets it to false if both QT5 and QT6 are false (which should never happen). You probably want 'if PYQT5' a

[kajongg] [Bug 486171] Doesn't actually work with Qt 6

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486171 --- Comment #8 from Wolfgang Rohdewald --- I don't have a gentoo account. How did he start kajongg? Value of environment variable QT_API must be pyside6. His statement about sip being required is wrong and makes me think he did not set QT_API. See htt

[kajongg] [Bug 486171] Doesn't actually work with Qt 6

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486171 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Sturmlechner --- (In reply to Andreas Sturmlechner from comment #6) > I don't think this was supposed to make kajongg PyQt[56]-only? We got the > following report: https://bugs.gentoo.org/939423 (the gist: > Will trigger erro

[kajongg] [Bug 486171] Doesn't actually work with Qt 6

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486171 Andreas Sturmlechner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ast...@gentoo.org --- Comment #6 from An

[kajongg] [Bug 486171] Doesn't actually work with Qt 6

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486171 Wolfgang Rohdewald changed: What|Removed |Added Version Fixed In|24.02.3 |24.05 --- Comment #5 from Wolfgang Rohdewa

[kajongg] [Bug 486171] Doesn't actually work with Qt 6

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486171 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aa...@kde.org --- Comment #4 from Albert As

[kajongg] [Bug 486171] Doesn't actually work with Qt 6

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486171 Wolfgang Rohdewald changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Version Fixed In|

[kajongg] [Bug 486171] Doesn't actually work with Qt 6

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486171 Antonio Rojas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDSINFO |REOPENED Ever confirmed|0

[kajongg] [Bug 486171] Doesn't actually work with Qt 6

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486171 Wolfgang Rohdewald changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|NEEDSINFO CC|