https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
Koutheir Attouchi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kouth...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving th
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
Chris changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|k...@ontoemail.com |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watc
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
--- Comment #34 from mrmi...@juno.com ---
NOTICE: I do not monitor this account, this is for junk mail only. Soon I will
delete this account. Seller beware!!!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
--- Comment #33 from King_DuckZ ---
Any hope to see some progress on this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
Simon Andric changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simonandr...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
--- Comment #32 from Thomas Schmitt ---
Hi,
i got feedback from Daniel Pielmeier, the Gentoo maintainer of libburn.
He fulfilled my wish to remove the problematic configuration option by:
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=55b96c727
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
--- Comment #31 from Thomas Schmitt ---
Hi,
> [ebuild R] dev-libs/libburn-1.4.8-r1::gentoo USE="track-src-odirect
> -debug -static-libs" 0 KiB
Here we have the trigger which activates my mistake of 2009.
I wonder why nobody noticed the problem
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
--- Comment #30 from King_DuckZ ---
> In this case i need to know from where you got libburn.so.
> It might be necessary that the upstream programmer talks to the distro
> packager.
My distro is Gentoo, info about the package:
$ emerge -pv dev-libs/l
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
--- Comment #29 from Thomas Schmitt ---
Hi,
i can reproduce the cdrskin problem by configuring libburn with option
--enable-track-src-odirect
The bug is a regression from end of 2009 by release 0.7.4, when cdrskin
forgot that it must prepare special
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
--- Comment #28 from Thomas Schmitt ---
Hi,
if the O_DIRECT theory is correct, then this should work without errno 22
cdrskin --allow_emulated_drives -v dev=stdio:/dev/null fs=32m -eject \
-waiti - <$path
and report as many read bytes as
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
--- Comment #27 from Thomas Schmitt ---
Hi,
grrr. The waste of your BD-R is to blame on libburn's automatic decision
to handle this burn under the SAO/DAO model: Known track size, as much
write preparations in advance as possible.
After the preparation
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
--- Comment #26 from Thomas Schmitt ---
Hi,
> The error ImgBurn gives me is something like "invalid address for write".
> Other users receiving that error were told it's because of the medium
> quality,
It's probably a miscoordination between burn pro
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
--- Comment #25 from King_DuckZ ---
I forgot to specify I ran ImgBurn 2.5.8 with Wine 3.0 on Linux Mint, kernel
4.4. I don't have Windows so I can't test ImgBurn natively. Blurays
successfully written with ImgBurn directly can be viewed on a PlayStation
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
--- Comment #24 from King_DuckZ ---
> there is still the riddle why ImgBurn on Wine produces mostly failing
> results but sometimes succeeds.
>
> An the first glimpse this does not look much like a filesystem format
> problem but more likely it is a pr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
--- Comment #23 from Thomas Schmitt ---
Hi,
there is still the riddle why ImgBurn on Wine produces mostly failing
results but sometimes succeeds.
An the first glimpse this does not look much like a filesystem format
problem but more likely it is a pro
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
--- Comment #22 from Thomas Schmitt ---
Hi,
> I already have a directory containing a BDMV subtree (and CERTIFICATE).
I can only google for these terms to learn what they mean.
But in general this looks like a good start for exercising the last
steps
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
--- Comment #21 from Leslie Zhai ---
(In reply to King_DuckZ from comment #12)
> Is there anything that can be done to help adding this feature? If there was
> some bounty to help towards buying whatever equipment developers need, I'd
> be happy to cont
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
--- Comment #20 from King_DuckZ ---
I can open an issue on their github, but just to be sure we're talking about
the same thing: I already have a directory containing a BDMV subtree (and
CERTIFICATE). I don't know if anything needs to be modified during
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
--- Comment #19 from Thomas Schmitt ---
Hi,
King_DuckZ wrote:
> Because I'm literally writing an UDF
> 2.5 bluray disk as we speak, through ImgBurn/wine. Windows app or not, it's
> still a userland program running on kernel 4.4
dev.d...@gmail.com poin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
--- Comment #18 from King_DuckZ ---
> The real problem is, that Linux still is unable to create UDF 2.50 or UDF
> 2.60 images
But is that relevant to Bluray burning? Because I'm literally writing an UDF
2.5 bluray disk as we speak, through ImgBurn/win
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
--- Comment #17 from Thomas Schmitt ---
Hi,
please excuse my clear language in this case:
dev.d...@gmail.com wrote:
> The real problem is, that Linux still is unable to create UDF 2.50 or
> UDF 2.60 images:
When it comes to data storage on optical me
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Schmitt ---
Hi,
> That sounds fair, if you guys have an account on librepay or bountyhunter
> let me know and I'll do what I can.
I myself am not hyngry enough for UDF.
As said, the specification is public:
http://www.ecm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
--- Comment #15 from dev.d...@gmail.com ---
>He seems to underestimate the other part of the job, namely to do for
>Blu-ray what dvdauthor does for DVD.
If you want to create Bluray movie disks, this is a special case IMO.
The real problem is, that Linu
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
--- Comment #14 from King_DuckZ ---
That sounds fair, if you guys have an account on librepay or bountyhunter let
me know and I'll do what I can.
Speaking of bribing and drugging, is there anything at all we can do, or is it
even useful, to ask the dud
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Schmitt ---
Hi,
Dkottmair, 2010:
> K3B also can't handle ISOs generated with UDF 2.5 in Nero,
> so you cannot even distribute ready-made Bluray/AVCHD-ISOs for burning!
This should now be possible after Leslie Zhai's changes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
--- Comment #12 from King_DuckZ ---
Is there anything that can be done to help adding this feature? If there was
some bounty to help towards buying whatever equipment developers need, I'd be
happy to contribute to it.
As of now, running ImgBurn in Wine
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
Leslie Zhai changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||carav...@gmail.com
--- Comment #11 from Leslie Zh
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
Chris changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@ontoemail.com
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
Dr. Chapatin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yy...@gmx.com
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
--- Comment #10 from Leslie Zhai ---
Hi Dkottmair,
> Actual Results: A disk with UDF 2.01 that will not play in a Bluray player
I do *NOT* have Blu-ray disc and players to reproduce the WRITE issue, and I
have *NOT* carefully read about linux/fs/udf
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Schmitt ---
The main problem is that google does not find any free tool to master
a UDF filesystem for Blu-ray. Burning the filesystem to media would
then be easy.
Aren't any Blu-ray players out there which play video files fr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
Leslie Zhai changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mag...@operamail.com
--- Comment #8 from Leslie Z
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
--- Comment #7 from Leslie Zhai ---
I have not read linux/fs/udf carefully, but if so limited support, it is a bad
news ;-(
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
Leslie Zhai changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||scdbac...@gmx.net
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
dev.d...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev.d...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from dev.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
Leslie Zhai changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiangzha...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from Leslie
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
King_DuckZ changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||king_du...@gmx.com
--- Comment #4 from King_DuckZ
37 matches
Mail list logo
