[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Gudian closed SUREFIRE-1044.
Resolution: Fixed
> Changed behaviour of TestNG test execution after implementing runOrde
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=337981#comment-337981
]
Andreas Gudian commented on SUREFIRE-1044:
--
I've rebased your commits locally and ran t
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=337982#comment-337982
]
Andreas Gudian commented on SUREFIRE-1048:
--
Looks like this issue could be closed then,
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Gudian reassigned SUREFIRE-1025:
Assignee: Andreas Gudian
> TestSetRunListener.testSetCompleted() should write fil
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Gudian closed SUREFIRE-1025.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed with commit f3d1a9e53a1145d99790dbeda5f24c57366f3065.
Would you give
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Gudian reassigned SUREFIRE-1031:
Assignee: Andreas Gudian
> Temp files are not deleted properly
>
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Gudian closed SUREFIRE-1031.
Resolution: Fixed
Having a rather small SSD myself, running the surefire-integration tests
r
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Gudian reassigned SUREFIRE-1038:
Assignee: Andreas Gudian
> Regression: Method depends on nonexistent group
>
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Gudian updated SUREFIRE-1038:
-
Fix Version/s: 2.17
> Regression: Method depends on nonexistent group
> ---
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Gudian closed SUREFIRE-1038.
Resolution: Fixed
@Gili, if you like, check 2.17-SNAPSHOT (your attached test case works with
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Gudian updated SUREFIRE-1051:
-
Fix Version/s: 2.17
> Surefire plugin creates files in /tmp and does not delete them on
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Gudian closed SUREFIRE-1051.
Resolution: Duplicate
It's a duplicate. But thanks for reporting it anyway! :)
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Gudian closed SUREFIRE-1048.
Resolution: Not A Bug
> Surefire does not use the total amount of threads specified by th
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=338195#comment-338195
]
Andreas Gudian commented on SUREFIRE-1049:
--
Actually, that's what is supposed to happen
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=338374#comment-338374
]
Andreas Gudian commented on SUREFIRE-1049:
--
That pom.xml shows a surefire version 2.11
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=338646#comment-338646
]
Andreas Gudian commented on SUREFIRE-1049:
--
Hi Leonardo,
I cloned your repo and checke
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Gudian closed SUREFIRE-1049.
Resolution: Not A Bug
my pleasure. ;-)
> Printing "running test" after test
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Gudian updated SUREFIRE-1056:
-
Fix Version/s: 2.17
> fractional forkCount does not work as intended on single core machine
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Gudian reassigned SUREFIRE-1056:
Assignee: Andreas Gudian
> fractional forkCount does not work as intended on single c
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Gudian closed SUREFIRE-1056.
Resolution: Fixed
Super-easy ones get fixed right away ;)
Commit: 2fa201d31da4add9b0051882cb
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=340730#comment-340730
]
Andreas Gudian commented on SUREFIRE-1058:
--
Could you provide a minimal sample project
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=340731#comment-340731
]
Andreas Gudian commented on SUREFIRE-1059:
--
Coul this be the same as SUREFIRE-1048?
>
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=340732#comment-340732
]
Andreas Gudian commented on SUREFIRE-1038:
--
As 2.16 is quite old already, we should jus
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=340755#comment-340755
]
Andreas Gudian commented on SUREFIRE-1058:
--
Yes, just zip and attach to this issue
> T
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=340779#comment-340779
]
Andreas Gudian commented on SUREFIRE-1059:
--
I think Tibor mentioned in the other ticket
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Gudian closed SUREFIRE-1059.
Resolution: Not A Bug
> Running tests in parallel seems to ignore threadCount
> -
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Gudian updated SUREFIRE-1058:
-
Fix Version/s: 2.17
> TestSetFailedException trying to use maven-surefire-plugin + regular
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Gudian reassigned SUREFIRE-1058:
Assignee: Andreas Gudian
> TestSetFailedException trying to use maven-surefire-plugin
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Gudian updated SUREFIRE-1058:
-
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
> TestSetFailedException trying to use maven-surefire-p
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=340973#comment-340973
]
Andreas Gudian commented on SUREFIRE-1058:
--
That's something that was never intended to
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Gudian closed SUREFIRE-1058.
Resolution: Fixed
> TestSetFailedException trying to use maven-surefire-plugin + regular
> e
501 - 531 of 531 matches
Mail list logo