[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Gudian closed SUREFIRE-1048.
------------------------------------
Resolution: Not A Bug
> Surefire does not use the total amount of threads specified by threadCount
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SUREFIRE-1048
> URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1048
> Project: Maven Surefire
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Junit 4.7+ (parallel) support
> Affects Versions: 2.16
> Reporter: Fabio Kenji Kume
> Attachments: surefire-parallel-test.zip
>
>
> Hello,
> We've been using Surefire Plugin's parallel settings since 2.16 in order to
> run our selenium-based integration tests.
> The way we run it is by using the following parameters:
> parallel='all', perCoreThreadCount=false, threadCount=20,
> useUnlimitedThreads=false, threadCountSuites=0, threadCountClasses=0,
> threadCountMethods=0
> We are running a Junit Suite using Categories. What we've noticed, though, is
> that even if we specify the total thread count as 20, we never see that
> number of tests being run in parallel. We could check that fact by viewing
> our selenium-grid's console, where we would see that the number of selenium
> grid nodes that were being used for tests were never the full 20.
> We've played around with different threadCount numbers and got the following
> results:
> threadCount / slots being used at selenium-grid
> 3 / 1
> 4 / 2
> 5 / 3
> 6 / 3
> 7 / 4
> 8 / 5
> 9 / 5
> 10 / 6
> 11 / 7
> 13 / 8
> It seems the number of threads being used is never the total of threads
> specified.
> I've created another project so I could test this around, which is attached
> to this issue.
> In it, I've created a Junit rule that will print the whenever a test starts,
> and a Test Suite using categories from another testcase.
> When I run it using threadCount = 10, I get the following:
> mvn clean test -Dtest=**/ExpSuite.java
> reports
> [INFO] parallel='all', perCoreThreadCount=false, threadCount=10,
> useUnlimitedThreads=false, threadCountSuites=0, threadCountClasses=0,
> threadCountMethods=0
> -------------------------------------------------------
> T E S T S
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Running second.ExpTest
> [Mon Dec 23 16:11:15 BRST 2013] START test_1
> [Mon Dec 23 16:11:15 BRST 2013] START test_7
> [Mon Dec 23 16:11:15 BRST 2013] START test_6
> [Mon Dec 23 16:11:15 BRST 2013] START test_3
> [Mon Dec 23 16:11:15 BRST 2013] START test_5
> [Mon Dec 23 16:11:15 BRST 2013] START test_10
> [Mon Dec 23 16:11:15 BRST 2013] START test_4
> [Mon Dec 23 16:11:15 BRST 2013] START test_2
> [Mon Dec 23 16:15:30 BRST 2013] START test_8
> [Mon Dec 23 16:15:32 BRST 2013] START test_9
> Seems that last two tests didn't get to run at the same time as the others,
> since they have very different date values. However, if I run them specifying
> the exact number of threadCountSuites, threadCountClasses and
> threadCountMethods, the tests run all in parallel:
> [INFO] parallel='all', perCoreThreadCount=false, threadCount=0,
> useUnlimitedThreads=false, threadCountSuites=10, threadCountClasses=10,
> threadCountMethods=10
> -------------------------------------------------------
> T E S T S
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Running second.ExpTest
> [Mon Dec 23 15:50:51 BRST 2013] START test_2
> [Mon Dec 23 15:50:51 BRST 2013] START test_7
> [Mon Dec 23 15:50:51 BRST 2013] START test_8
> [Mon Dec 23 15:50:51 BRST 2013] START test_9
> [Mon Dec 23 15:50:51 BRST 2013] START test_10
> [Mon Dec 23 15:50:51 BRST 2013] START test_1
> [Mon Dec 23 15:50:51 BRST 2013] START test_3
> [Mon Dec 23 15:50:51 BRST 2013] START test_4
> [Mon Dec 23 15:50:51 BRST 2013] START test_6
> [Mon Dec 23 15:50:51 BRST 2013] START test_5
> Tests run: 10, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 3,320.712
> sec - in second.ExpTest
> If I try running only the test class (ExpTest), I get the following:
> mvn clean test -Dtest=**/ExpTest.java
> [INFO] parallel='all', perCoreThreadCount=false, threadCount=10,
> useUnlimitedThreads=false, threadCountSuites=0, threadCountClasses=0,
> threadCountMethods=0
> -------------------------------------------------------
> T E S T S
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Running second.ExpTest
> [Mon Dec 23 17:07:46 BRST 2013] START test_3
> [Mon Dec 23 17:07:46 BRST 2013] START test_8
> [Mon Dec 23 17:07:46 BRST 2013] START test_1
> [Mon Dec 23 17:07:46 BRST 2013] START test_2
> [Mon Dec 23 17:07:46 BRST 2013] START test_7
> [Mon Dec 23 17:07:46 BRST 2013] START test_6
> [Mon Dec 23 17:07:46 BRST 2013] START test_10
> [Mon Dec 23 17:07:46 BRST 2013] START test_5
> [Mon Dec 23 17:07:46 BRST 2013] START test_4
> [Mon Dec 23 17:12:37 BRST 2013] START test_9
> Tests run: 10, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2,710.144
> sec - in second.ExpTest
> We still didn't get the 10 threads to run.
> I've looked around the source code and it seems to be related to how surefire
> calculates the ratio of threads that should be allocated to run methods,
> suites and classes.
> Could you help me with this?
> Thank you,
> Fabio Kenji
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
