[jira] Created: (MANTRUN-105) When running Java Ant task with a configured ouputproperty attribute, the property does not get created

2009-01-15 Thread Detelin Yordanov (JIRA)
When running Java Ant task with a configured ouputproperty attribute, the property does not get created --- Key: MANTRUN-105 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/M

[jira] Commented: (MDEP-182) Add exclude*, parameters to copy mojo (analogous to copy-dependencies mojo)

2008-10-17 Thread Detelin Yordanov (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MDEP-182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=151113#action_151113 ] Detelin Yordanov commented on MDEP-182: --- I will also find this very helpful, currently I'm having

[jira] Created: (MJAVADOC-198) AbstractJavadocMojo#getClasspath(..) should use subProject's managedVersionMap

2008-07-17 Thread Detelin Yordanov (JIRA)
AbstractJavadocMojo#getClasspath(..) should use subProject's managedVersionMap -- Key: MJAVADOC-198 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-198 Project: Maven 2.x Javado

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (MASSEMBLY-298) Includes/Excludes within are ignored

2008-06-16 Thread Detelin Yordanov (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=138744#action_138744 ] detyo edited comment on MASSEMBLY-298 at 6/16/08 8:11 AM: - No,

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (MASSEMBLY-298) Includes/Excludes within are ignored

2008-06-16 Thread Detelin Yordanov (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=138744#action_138744 ] detyo edited comment on MASSEMBLY-298 at 6/16/08 8:03 AM: - No,

[jira] Commented: (MASSEMBLY-298) Includes/Excludes within are ignored

2008-06-16 Thread Detelin Yordanov (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=138744#action_138744 ] Detelin Yordanov commented on MASSEMBLY-298: No, this is different. The "unpackOptions