uschindler commented on PR #14509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14509#issuecomment-2808928300
Could we get some context/issue what this is about?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL ab
benwtrent commented on PR #14226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14226#issuecomment-2809670383
> , I'm in favor of fixing it as a magic number that replicates something
close to the current behavior (or better recall if we can and retain the same
latency as we found with lambda=
thecoop opened a new pull request, #14510:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14510
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-m
msokolov commented on PR #14226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14226#issuecomment-2810290056
As far as making this the default, that sounds OK to me, but let's not
backport until we've had a chance to verify no harm for a while in some
pre-production environments
--
This is
bharath-techie opened a new pull request, #14512:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14512
### Description
Resolves https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14463
I have made changes similar to https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13985
to update read advice to sequent
thecoop opened a new pull request, #14509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14509
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-m
thecoop commented on PR #14509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14509#issuecomment-2808933733
This is following on from https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14482. This
is in draft, as I wanted to see that this refactoring worked cleanly based on
the changes in #14482, but needs
uschindler commented on issue #14508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14508#issuecomment-2809265915
> [@msfroh](https://github.com/msfroh) would you know how to tackle this
better than forcing FSDirectory in this test?
Policeman Jenkins poor NVME disk!!! The new serve
dweiss merged PR #14504:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14504
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apac
dweiss merged PR #14502:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14502
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apac
expani opened a new pull request, #14511:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14511
### Description
Fix for https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14445
Falling back to return a SlowImpactsEnum for all default cases but ensuring
skip data is read for case where field i
expani commented on code in PR #14511:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14511#discussion_r2047829308
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene103/Lucene103PostingsReader.java:
##
@@ -1310,7 +1317,7 @@ public List getImpacts(int level) {
r
msfroh commented on code in PR #14511:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14511#discussion_r2047793102
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene103/Lucene103PostingsReader.java:
##
@@ -1310,7 +1317,7 @@ public List getImpacts(int level) {
r
vigyasharma opened a new issue, #14515:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14515
IndexWriter provides a `forceMergeDeletes` API which triggers force merging
of all segments that have deleted documents, allowing users to expunge deletes
up to a configurable delete percentage (set v
jainankitk commented on issue #14496:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14496#issuecomment-2811880891
We have similar backport workflow in OpenSearch, that might be useful -
https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/blob/main/.github/workflows/backport.yml.
Just need to ad
15 matches
Mail list logo
