andywebb1975 commented on PR #13510:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13510#issuecomment-2186079766
I've been exploring constraining `maxValue` so we're more likely to see
same-score items each time - e.g. using 50 in `int maxValue =
TestUtil.nextInt(random(), 10, 50);` rather tha
javanna commented on PR #13472:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13472#issuecomment-2186218069
Thanks all for the feedback. It seems that we are converging on the
improvement that this PR brings. I personally think that even besides
performance, allowing to using a single executor
jpountz commented on PR #13472:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13472#issuecomment-2186238054
I think @mikemccand is in the process of giving more threads to nightly
benchmarks. It would be good to collect a few data points before merging this
change so that we can see a clear bu
jpountz commented on PR #13359:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13359#issuecomment-2186240846
I will merge soon if there are no objections.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go