jpountz commented on code in PR #12206:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12206#discussion_r1137412879
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/ByteBuffersDataInput.java:
##
@@ -71,7 +71,11 @@ public ByteBuffersDataInput(List buffers) {
this.blockMask = (1
mikemccand commented on code in PR #12206:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12206#discussion_r1138515062
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/ByteBuffersDataInput.java:
##
@@ -71,7 +71,11 @@ public ByteBuffersDataInput(List buffers) {
this.blockMask =
jpountz merged PR #12206:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12206
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
s1monw commented on code in PR #12205:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12205#discussion_r1138779734
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/DocumentsWriterFlushControl.java:
##
@@ -604,7 +620,9 @@ long markForFullFlush() {
* blocking indexing.*/
jpountz commented on code in PR #12205:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12205#discussion_r1138844621
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/DocumentsWriterFlushControl.java:
##
@@ -634,7 +652,9 @@ private void pruneBlockedQueue(final
DocumentsWriterDeleteQue
stefanvodita commented on PR #11729:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11729#issuecomment-1472199332
Bumping this PR because I think it’s a good change in its current form. The
increased expressiveness would be helpful to me if I was using this class.
--
This is an automated mess
magibney opened a new pull request, #12207:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12207
For all but extremely selective queries (which are quite fast anyway), the
performance of `PrefixQuery` benefits from directly subclassing
`MultiTermQuery`, as opposed to subclassing `AutomatonQuery
magibney commented on PR #12207:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12207#issuecomment-1472396185
In evaluating this change with `luceneutil` benchmarks, I found that the
change had _very_ different effects depending on how many terms were matched by
a given prefix -- so I distingui
jpountz commented on code in PR #12205:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12205#discussion_r1139164751
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/DocumentsWriterFlushControl.java:
##
@@ -634,7 +652,9 @@ private void pruneBlockedQueue(final
DocumentsWriterDeleteQue
jpountz commented on code in PR #12205:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12205#discussion_r1139165859
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/DocumentsWriterFlushControl.java:
##
@@ -133,7 +156,7 @@ private boolean assertMemory() {
// peak document
10 matches
Mail list logo