[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10610) RunAutomaton#hashCode() can easily cause hash collision for different Automatons

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553063#comment-17553063 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-10610: I think the problem may be query cachi

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10610) RunAutomaton#hashCode() can easily cause hash collision for different Automatons

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553075#comment-17553075 ] Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-10610: Sorry if I casually dag up an old disc

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10610) RunAutomaton#hashCode() can easily cause hash collision for different Automatons

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553131#comment-17553131 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-10610: I looked at the code again: - Automato

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-10610) RunAutomaton#hashCode() can easily cause hash collision for different Automatons

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553131#comment-17553131 ] Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-10610 at 6/11/22 5:49 PM:

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-10610) RunAutomaton#hashCode() can easily cause hash collision for different Automatons

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553131#comment-17553131 ] Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-10610 at 6/11/22 5:51 PM:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10610) RunAutomaton#hashCode() can easily cause hash collision for different Automatons

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553133#comment-17553133 ] Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-10610: -- > I do not think we need to discuss if equ

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10610) RunAutomaton#hashCode() can easily cause hash collision for different Automatons

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553136#comment-17553136 ] Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-10610: bq. I would just make the already exis

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10610) RunAutomaton#hashCode() can easily cause hash collision for different Automatons

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553142#comment-17553142 ] Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-10610: I've been thinking about those three o

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-10610) RunAutomaton#hashCode() can easily cause hash collision for different Automatons

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553142#comment-17553142 ] Tomoko Uchida edited comment on LUCENE-10610 at 6/11/22 6:47 PM:

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-10610) RunAutomaton#hashCode() can easily cause hash collision for different Automatons

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553142#comment-17553142 ] Tomoko Uchida edited comment on LUCENE-10610 at 6/11/22 7:13 PM:

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-10610) RunAutomaton#hashCode() can easily cause hash collision for different Automatons

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553142#comment-17553142 ] Tomoko Uchida edited comment on LUCENE-10610 at 6/11/22 7:54 PM:

[GitHub] [lucene] shaie commented on pull request #841: LUCENE-10274: Add hyperrectangle faceting capabilities

shaie commented on PR #841: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/841#issuecomment-1153077923 > I feel like having 2 `matches` functions in this case would make the API unnecessarily complex As I wrote before "_After we decide whether to stick w/ the long[] or byte[] API we'll r

[GitHub] [lucene] shaie commented on pull request #841: LUCENE-10274: Add hyperrectangle faceting capabilities

shaie commented on PR #841: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/841#issuecomment-1153078375 > pushed a change just now that shows a different way we _could_ approach this. If I understand your change correctly, then it creates a new `long[]` in each call to `matches()` right?