[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17429662#comment-17429662
]
Jan Høydahl commented on LUCENE-10184:
--
+1 I also suggested similar for Solr proje
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17429670#comment-17429670
]
Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-10163:
bq. I think a pragmatic approach is to
mocobeta opened a new pull request #390:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/390
BUILD.md is no longer exists.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To un
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17429675#comment-17429675
]
Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-10163:
Maybe related to this issue, I removed
mocobeta merged pull request #390:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/390
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17429679#comment-17429679
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10163:
--
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17429690#comment-17429690
]
Michael Sokolov commented on LUCENE-10170:
--
IIRC luceneutil does have some sup
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17429694#comment-17429694
]
Michael Sokolov commented on LUCENE-10180:
--
Thanks for digging - does the prop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17429704#comment-17429704
]
Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-10184:
Also, top-level README's "Building wit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nhat Nguyen updated LUCENE-10159:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Index corruption: IndexOutOfBoundsException for doc valu
rmuir commented on a change in pull request #389:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/389#discussion_r730451580
##
File path:
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene90/Lucene90DocValuesProducer.java
##
@@ -1402,15 +1403,23 @@ public int docID() {
@Ov
dnhatn commented on a change in pull request #389:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/389#discussion_r730454030
##
File path:
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene90/Lucene90DocValuesProducer.java
##
@@ -1402,15 +1403,23 @@ public int docID() {
@O
dnhatn commented on a change in pull request #389:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/389#discussion_r730456115
##
File path:
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene90/Lucene90DocValuesProducer.java
##
@@ -1402,15 +1403,23 @@ public int docID() {
@O
janhoy opened a new pull request #391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/391
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9997
This is the second pass of changes to smoketester for the new gradle build.
* Adapt to the new source-tgz file layout
* Tested gradlew comm
janhoy commented on pull request #391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/391#issuecomment-945210830
The smoketester is tested locally and currently stops at **verify maven
artifact sigs**
```
command "gpg --homedir
/tmp/smoke_lucene_9.0.0_537d435f5ee7c884221371a59673b878d82f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17429776#comment-17429776
]
Jan Høydahl commented on LUCENE-9997:
-
New PR [https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17428828#comment-17428828
]
Jan Høydahl edited comment on LUCENE-9997 at 10/17/21, 11:06 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17429776#comment-17429776
]
Jan Høydahl edited comment on LUCENE-9997 at 10/17/21, 11:11 PM:
-
janhoy commented on pull request #391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/391#issuecomment-945212495
Reporoduce like this
```
git checkout -b janhoy-lucene9997-smoketester-part-2 main
git pull https://github.com/janhoy/lucene.git lucene9997-smoketester-part-2
python3
janhoy merged pull request #388:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/388
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17429777#comment-17429777
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10163:
--
Co
dnhatn commented on pull request #389:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/389#issuecomment-945276042
@rmuir I pushed
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/389/commits/4ee7a6bd90d275a7df193a87aea3836c65a786ff
to write more trailing bytes. Would you mind taking another look? Thank yo
rmuir commented on pull request #389:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/389#issuecomment-945322135
Hmm, sorry if I'm being overly nitpicky, but it doesn't seem good to mix
this concern into `DirectWriter`? It has nothing to do with `DirectWriter`.
Seems like writing the extra `0`
rmuir commented on pull request #389:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/389#issuecomment-945324108
Also, given that writing a sortedset is really just a sortednumeric, isn't
sortednumeric impacted by the bug too? would it easier to test for this bug
with a sortednumeric unit test?
dsmiley commented on a change in pull request #362:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/362#discussion_r730550959
##
File path:
lucene/highlighter/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/uhighlight/UnifiedHighlighter.java
##
@@ -1168,9 +1174,12 @@ public CacheHelper getReader
apanimesh061 commented on a change in pull request #362:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/362#discussion_r730555792
##
File path:
lucene/highlighter/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/uhighlight/UnifiedHighlighter.java
##
@@ -1168,9 +1174,12 @@ public CacheHelper getR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17429816#comment-17429816
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-9997:
-
Hi Jan. These maven artifacts are not signed
jpountz commented on a change in pull request #389:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/389#discussion_r730575499
##
File path:
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene90/Lucene90DocValuesProducer.java
##
@@ -1402,15 +1403,23 @@ public int docID() {
@
jpountz commented on pull request #389:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/389#issuecomment-945374678
I think the test is useful to double check that the change is fixing the
issue but I'm not sure if we should merge it: it wouldn't be manageable to have
tests at the doc-values for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17429819#comment-17429819
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-10182:
--
This helps now but doesn't prevent the err
30 matches
Mail list logo
