[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17366604#comment-17366604
]
Mayya Sharipova commented on LUCENE-9902:
-
[~gworah] It looks like this change h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17366605#comment-17366605
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-9976:
-
Commi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17366671#comment-17366671
]
Gautam Worah commented on LUCENE-9902:
--
Oh! I incorrectly put it under the Lucene 8
gautamworah96 opened a new pull request #190:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/190
This change was added for release 9.0 but its changes entry was under
release 8.9. This commit readjusts the file accordingly.
cc: @mayya-sharipova
# Checklist
Please review th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17366671#comment-17366671
]
Gautam Worah edited comment on LUCENE-9902 at 6/21/21, 3:43 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17366743#comment-17366743
]
Michael Gibney commented on LUCENE-9204:
Thanks! Right, in this initial case, co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nhat Nguyen updated LUCENE-9935:
Fix Version/s: (was: 8.9)
8.10
> Bulk merges for stored fields when index s
gautamworah96 opened a new pull request #191:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/191
Additionally, minor method name and variable refactoring in the
TestLongValueFacetCounts class
(The name `valueCount` was a bit misleading because it was actually
representing the
dnhatn opened a new pull request #192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/192
This change makes DocValuesIterator public so we use the `advanceExact()`
method on a "generic" doc values iterator.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messa
dsmiley commented on pull request #192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/192#issuecomment-865475628
This has come up not just once but twice. Even then I suspect maybe a third
might be somewhere ;-)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9203
Discuss in JIRA.
--
Th
Haoyu Zhai created LUCENE-10010:
---
Summary: Should we have a NFA Query?
Key: LUCENE-10010
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10010
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type: New Feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17367020#comment-17367020
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-10010:
--
I think it makes sense. Russ's article is
12 matches
Mail list logo