jpountz commented on PR #14364:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14364#issuecomment-2738217161
Agreed!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscr
javanna commented on PR #14364:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14364#issuecomment-2738284353
Thanks @jpountz for all the help!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spec
javanna merged PR #14364:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14364
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
javanna commented on PR #14364:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14364#issuecomment-2737720139
I merged main in after merging #14372 and added a changelog entry. I believe
this is ready to go, and can now be backported to branch_10x as-is.
--
This is an automated message from th
javanna commented on PR #14364:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14364#issuecomment-2736648444
I opened #14372 to address the visibility issue of `load`, that should
simplify this PR and backporting it once merged.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
jpountz commented on PR #14364:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14364#issuecomment-2736470811
Good question. The class is public and looked like a user-facing API hence
my comment, but you can't serialize a NRTSuggester yourself since
`NRTSuggesterBuilder` is pkg-private. So it l
javanna commented on PR #14364:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14364#issuecomment-2736271001
Cool then I will target this PR at main only, and open a separate PR for
`branch_10x`. Out of curiosity, what are the usecases where you'd expect users
to call `NRTSuggester#load` direct
jpountz commented on PR #14364:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14364#issuecomment-2735857094
I was thinking of keeping the `load(IndexInput, FSTLoadMode)` static method,
documenting that the load mode is ignored and deprecating it. Indeed that would
require keeping the `FSTLoadM
javanna commented on PR #14364:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14364#issuecomment-2735835683
Thanks @jpountz what's your suggestion around back-compat? Sounds like you
are suggesting not backporting the removal of the fst load mode enum but only
the switch to off-heap by default
javanna commented on code in PR #14364:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14364#discussion_r2000898675
##
lucene/suggest/src/test/org/apache/lucene/search/suggest/document/TestSuggestField.java:
##
@@ -951,7 +951,16 @@ static IndexWriterConfig iwcWithSuggestField(Analyz
10 matches
Mail list logo