uschindler commented on PR #12680:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12680#issuecomment-1763463280
I backported this one to 9.x. As I cleaned up commits, this one was
committed in 9.x as part of #12681
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to th
rmuir merged PR #12680:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12680
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apach
rmuir commented on PR #12680:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12680#issuecomment-1763090784
cosine() ones cleaned up now too. I don't see perf issue with the array:
guess this whole shebang relies on escape analysis anyway.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Se
rmuir opened a new pull request, #12680:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12680
Now that we have integrated benchmarks, it is easier to take care of this
code.
This is pretty straightforward change:
* split out vectorized loops to avoid huge methods (especially integer
