s1monw commented on PR #12929:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12929#issuecomment-1893520487
I was working on adding some new BWC tests for the parent field and it seems
BWC index creation and testing is relying on some things that changed here.
Just flagging this for now while I
jpountz merged PR #12929:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12929
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
jpountz commented on PR #12929:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12929#issuecomment-1862488472
From a quick check, the luceneutil version has much more complexity around
indexing facets, doc values, etc. It's not entirely obvious to me if sharing
the code would help or hurt.
--
mikemccand commented on PR #12929:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12929#issuecomment-1855665643
> @mikemccand luceneutil is better at remaining up-to-date with Lucene than
Lucene itself :)
[mikemccand/luceneutil@76ff349](https://github.com/mikemccand/luceneutil/commit/76ff349499
jpountz commented on PR #12929:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12929#issuecomment-1853880383
@mikemccand luceneutil is better at remaining up-to-date with Lucene than
Lucene itself :)
https://github.com/mikemccand/luceneutil/commit/76ff349499fe6226c9ea74c37dd2fa9db3a46272
http
jpountz opened a new pull request, #12929:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12929
This replaces `StringField`/`SortedDocValuesField` with `KeywordField` and
`IntPoint`/`NumericDocValuesField` with `IntField`.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To re
