mikemccand commented on PR #12929:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12929#issuecomment-1855665643

   > @mikemccand luceneutil is better at remaining up-to-date with Lucene than 
Lucene itself :) 
[mikemccand/luceneutil@76ff349](https://github.com/mikemccand/luceneutil/commit/76ff349499fe6226c9ea74c37dd2fa9db3a46272)
 
[mikemccand/luceneutil@bb071f7](https://github.com/mikemccand/luceneutil/commit/bb071f72044c5c2ce5df427b45a97820bc4d9be4)
   
   Ha!  Wild :)
   
   Maybe we should unfork?  Why does luceneutil need a hard fork here ... 
couldn't it just depend on Lucene's `test-framework` to pull this dep in?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to