github-actions[bot] commented on PR #14493:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14493#issuecomment-2840521041
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contributi
rmuir commented on PR #14493:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14493#issuecomment-2804210293
> What would be the right way to get the original input string then, please?
Or do you just declare that `RegExp` does not support that?
>
It doesn't have a method to support thi
Tasssadar commented on PR #14493:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14493#issuecomment-2804173363
> Separately: the output of .toString() is just that, for humans, and not
guaranteed to be reparsable. I can practically guarantee it is a bad idea to do
this.
What would be the
rmuir commented on PR #14493:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14493#issuecomment-2804077216
I like the change. We can get fancy and extend it in the future, but the
`toString()` today does not do its one job, the output is not readable. This
fixes it to be more practical and not
