Re: [I] Odd nightly error in buildAndPushRelease: NoSuchMethodException: no such method: java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle.linkToStatic [lucene]

2024-09-15 Thread via GitHub
dweiss commented on issue #13792: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13792#issuecomment-2352106580 A subsequent run passed: https://github.com/apache/lucene/actions/runs/10878436971 I'll leave this open and maybe add a ```--stacktrace``` to gradle incantations from buildA

[I] Odd nightly error in buildAndPushRelease: NoSuchMethodException: no such method: java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle.linkToStatic [lucene]

2024-09-15 Thread via GitHub
dweiss opened a new issue, #13792: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13792 ### Description Out of the blue this happened: https://github.com/apache/lucene/actions/runs/10876597333/job/30176738581. The captured release.log doesn't contain much information other than this

Re: [PR] Use range optimizations for "slow" MultiTermQueries when terms happen to be contiguous [lucene]

2024-09-15 Thread via GitHub
gsmiller commented on PR #13693: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13693#issuecomment-2351893751 Thanks so much @iverase for the feedback! I wanted to approach this as a query rewrite initially, but I'm not sure it's all the feasible. The issue is that the ordinal mapping is segmen

Re: [PR] Remove 8 bit quantization for HNSW/KNN vector indexing [lucene]

2024-09-15 Thread via GitHub
mikemccand commented on PR #13767: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13767#issuecomment-2351763664 > Also, we should backport this for 9.12? I think it's OK to make a hard break there for 8 bit quantization, since it's not working today at search time in 9.11 anyways? Actual

Re: [I] Significant drop in recall for 8 bit Scalar Quantizer [lucene]

2024-09-15 Thread via GitHub
mikemccand closed issue #13519: Significant drop in recall for 8 bit Scalar Quantizer URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13519 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific

Re: [PR] Remove 8 bit quantization for HNSW/KNN vector indexing [lucene]

2024-09-15 Thread via GitHub
mikemccand merged PR #13767: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13767 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.

Re: [PR] Fix TestShapeDocValues.testLatLonPolygonBBox [lucene]

2024-09-15 Thread via GitHub
msokolov merged PR #13743: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13743 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.ap

Re: [PR] Fix TestShapeDocValues.testLatLonPolygonBBox [lucene]

2024-09-15 Thread via GitHub
msokolov commented on PR #13743: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13743#issuecomment-2351686402 > its tricky to find some sane epsilon in this case (which would only skip running the test unnecessarily) I agree, and this is fine, but my intuition is there will be some fiddl

Re: [I] TestShapeDocValues.testLatLonPolygonBBox [lucene]

2024-09-15 Thread via GitHub
msokolov closed issue #13531: TestShapeDocValues.testLatLonPolygonBBox URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13531 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To uns