vsop-479 commented on issue #13396:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13396#issuecomment-2121851897
@jpountz
Please take a look when you get a chance.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
vsop-479 opened a new issue, #13396:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13396
### Description
Test failure in `TestBlockMaxConjunction.testRandom`.
### Gradle command to reproduce
gradlew test --tests TestBlockMaxConjunction.testRandom
-Dtests.seed=991AA33DE604
vsop-479 opened a new pull request, #13395:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13395
### Description
We can delete all live docs when a query matched a whole segment, in
`FrozenBufferedUpdates.applyQueryDeletes`.
I has implemented it for `PointRangeQuery`, and also tryi
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #13315:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13315#issuecomment-2121472564
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contributi
navneet1v commented on PR #13394:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13394#issuecomment-2121465615
cc: @benwtrent , @msokolov
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
navneet1v opened a new pull request, #13394:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13394
### Description
Add support for reloading the SPI for KnnVectorsFormat class
Ref: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13393
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Gi
navneet1v commented on issue #13393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13393#issuecomment-2121465417
I have raised a PR for the fix: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13394
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
navneet1v opened a new issue, #13393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13393
### Description
## Description
Lucene uses SPI to get the instance for various classes like Codec,
KNNVectorsFormat etc.
Currently Codec class provide a way to reload the SPIs by provid
naveentatikonda commented on issue #13350:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13350#issuecomment-2121286374
@benwtrent To be on the same page, can you please confirm if you have used 7
bits or 8 bits in your experiment that you ran above with cohere dataset using
InnerProduct to g
dweiss commented on code in PR #13392:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13392#discussion_r1607243701
##
lucene/join/src/java/module-info.java:
##
@@ -16,8 +16,10 @@
*/
/** Index-time and Query-time joins for normalized content */
+@SuppressWarnings({"requires-auto
bruno-roustant opened a new pull request, #13392:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13392
No functional changes, only replacements by primitve maps.
Adds LongObjectHashMap and LongIntHashMap to the org.apache.lucene.util.hppc
package, with some refactoring.
Adds a depe
dweiss commented on issue #13391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13391#issuecomment-2120947487
Perhaps this wasn't clear - the important bit here is the use of
TermInSetQuery (the query parsed substitutes large boolean expressions to this
type of query to prevent max-boolean-c
dweiss opened a new issue, #13391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13391
### Description
I stumbled across this one in a real-life application, where matches-API
based highlighting of a query like this:
field:(a OR b OR c OR d OR ...)
took very long to compl
uschindler commented on PR #13389:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13389#issuecomment-2120877177
> > The method is only intended to be called by Lucene code.
>
> Then it should not be a public API.
>
> Agree with comment by @romseygeek that since DisjunctionIntervalsS
shubhamvishu commented on PR #13328:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13328#issuecomment-2120851082
Hi @uschindler , sorry I was on vacation until last week, so this PR
stalled. I'll take a look at the comments today or tomorrow.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache G
expani commented on PR #13389:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13389#issuecomment-2120850127
>The method is only intended to be called by Lucene code.
Then it should not be a public API.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messa
expani commented on PR #13389:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13389#issuecomment-2120718603
>It's internal and not for public use?
It's [marked
public](https://github.com/apache/lucene/blob/main/lucene/queries/src/java/org/apache/lucene/queries/intervals/Intervals.java#L51
uschindler commented on PR #13389:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13389#issuecomment-2120709541
Why should anybody call that method. It's internal and not for public use?
Those type of changes are common in Lucene. We change behavior of methods
unless it's documented to be
expani commented on PR #13389:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13389#issuecomment-2120691885
My main concern was the public API `Intervals#analyzedText`
Clients of lucene were getting a non-null iterator till now and will receive
a null iterator after this change.
uschindler commented on PR #13389:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13389#issuecomment-2120667481
> * Lot of [interval
functions](https://github.com/apache/lucene/tree/main/lucene/queryparser/src/java/org/apache/lucene/queryparser/flexible/standard/nodes/intervalfn)
( around 21 us
romseygeek commented on PR #13389:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13389#issuecomment-2120650022
Returning `null` is always OK here - if you look at
ConjunctionIntervalsSource or DisjunctionIntervalsSource, the sub-sources can
always return `null` to indicate that there are no in
expani commented on PR #13389:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13389#issuecomment-2120639358
- Lot of [interval
functions](https://github.com/apache/lucene/tree/main/lucene/queryparser/src/java/org/apache/lucene/queryparser/flexible/standard/nodes/intervalfn)
( around 21 usage )
iamsanjay opened a new pull request, #13390:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13390
### Description
#13112
Made fields final and removed their respective setters. Introduced the
Builder pattern to facilitate the construction of ShingleFilter instances. All
previous
uschindler commented on code in PR #13389:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13389#discussion_r1606861463
##
lucene/queries/src/java/org/apache/lucene/queries/intervals/IntervalBuilder.java:
##
@@ -67,15 +67,15 @@
*/
final class IntervalBuilder {
static IntervalsS
uschindler commented on PR #13389:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13389#issuecomment-2120600483
Just some tidy missing. 😜
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
uschindler commented on code in PR #13389:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13389#discussion_r1606861463
##
lucene/queries/src/java/org/apache/lucene/queries/intervals/IntervalBuilder.java:
##
@@ -67,15 +67,15 @@
*/
final class IntervalBuilder {
static IntervalsS
expani commented on code in PR #13389:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13389#discussion_r1606859997
##
lucene/queries/src/java/org/apache/lucene/queries/intervals/IntervalBuilder.java:
##
@@ -67,15 +67,15 @@
*/
final class IntervalBuilder {
static IntervalsSourc
romseygeek commented on issue #13388:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13388#issuecomment-2120568422
I opened #13389
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comm
romseygeek opened a new pull request, #13389:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13389
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe,
uschindler commented on PR #13385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13385#issuecomment-2120514592
This problem is often seen with patent search. I opened
https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13388
There are more issues, but making that constant publicly available is wrong
uschindler commented on PR #13385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13385#issuecomment-2120497218
See #13388
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To un
uschindler opened a new issue, #13388:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13388
### Description
Followup of #13385:
While reviewing #13385 I stumbled on the same issue I had several times
while building a intervals query parser for patent search (a Solr plugin for a
uschindler commented on PR #13385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13385#issuecomment-2120480997
OK. Just for brevity: How does the one made public here differs from the
already existing class (except that one returns null iterator while the other
one returns an empty iterator)?
romseygeek commented on PR #13385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13385#issuecomment-2120479350
Let's open a new issue and we can discuss a bit more about when you need
such a thing and where it should live.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respo
uschindler commented on PR #13385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13385#issuecomment-2120476676
Should I open a new issue, or should we revert this one and give a better
solution?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please lo
romseygeek merged PR #13385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13385
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.
msokolov closed issue #13386: Inconsistency Vector Search Cosine Similarity
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13386
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
T
msokolov commented on issue #13386:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13386#issuecomment-2120370226
This is to be expected from *approximate* KNN search. If you want to get a
sense of the accuracy you need to look at a larger number of results in
aggregate rather than a single ex
stefanvodita commented on issue #13335:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13335#issuecomment-2120336275
It's true that we have this two-step process for aggregations (incl. counts)
and that it's not always the most efficient solution.
+1 to try out this optimisation, sounds pro
expani commented on code in PR #13385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13385#discussion_r1606657816
##
lucene/CHANGES.txt:
##
@@ -362,6 +362,8 @@ Other
* GITHUB#13077: Add public getter for SynonymQuery#field (Andrey Bozhko)
+* GITHUB#13385: Make NO_INTERVALS sou
expani commented on PR #13385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13385#issuecomment-2120275366
Added @romseygeek
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
T
romseygeek commented on code in PR #13385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13385#discussion_r1606623194
##
lucene/CHANGES.txt:
##
@@ -362,6 +362,8 @@ Other
* GITHUB#13077: Add public getter for SynonymQuery#field (Andrey Bozhko)
+* GITHUB#13385: Make NO_INTERVALS
expani commented on PR #13385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13385#issuecomment-2120241068
@jainankitk @romseygeek Requesting an approval.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
RS146BIJAY opened a new issue, #13387:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13387
### Description
## Issue
Today, Lucene internally creates multiple DocumentWriterPerThread (DWPT)
instances per shard to facilitate concurrent indexing across different
ingestion threads.
romseygeek commented on PR #13385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13385#issuecomment-2119987080
We can backport this to 9x so add the entry under the latest 9x version.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitH
expani commented on PR #13385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13385#issuecomment-2119945093
@romseygeek Should I add only under `Lucene 10.0.0` or other versions as
well ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
romseygeek commented on PR #13385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13385#issuecomment-2119913543
LGTM. Can you add an entry to CHANGES.txt?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to g
jainankitk commented on PR #13385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13385#issuecomment-2119856228
Makes sense for IntervalBuilder clients to use the existing IntervalsSource
implementation. Also, safe to make public given the variable is static final.
Approved!
--
This is an au
expani opened a new pull request, #13385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13385
### Description
A [bug](https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/issues/13616) was
reported in OpenSearch which caused Interval Queries containing sub-query in
rules to fail with `Sub-itera
gf2121 merged PR #13221:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13221
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apac
50 matches
Mail list logo