Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
dweiss commented on code in PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#discussion_r1487332805 ## lucene/backward-codecs/src/test/org/apache/lucene/backward_index/BackwardsCompatibilityTestBase.java: ## @@ -47,25 +47,64 @@ public abstract class BackwardsCompat

Re: [PR] Fix test failure for TestDocumentsWriterDeleteQueue.testUpdateDeleteSlices [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
gf2121 merged PR #13089: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13089 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apac

Re: [PR] Cleanup TokenizedPhraseQueryNode code [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #13041: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13041#issuecomment-1939836557 This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you for your contributi

Re: [PR] [LUCENE-13044][replicator] NRT add configurable commitData for Custom… [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #13045: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13045#issuecomment-1939836328 This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you for your contributi

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
uschindler commented on code in PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#discussion_r1486879238 ## lucene/backward-codecs/src/test/org/apache/lucene/backward_index/BackwardsCompatibilityTestBase.java: ## @@ -47,25 +47,64 @@ public abstract class BackwardsCo

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
uschindler commented on code in PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#discussion_r1486879238 ## lucene/backward-codecs/src/test/org/apache/lucene/backward_index/BackwardsCompatibilityTestBase.java: ## @@ -47,25 +47,64 @@ public abstract class BackwardsCo

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
uschindler commented on code in PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#discussion_r1486881008 ## lucene/backward-codecs/src/test/org/apache/lucene/backward_index/BackwardsCompatibilityTestBase.java: ## @@ -47,25 +47,64 @@ public abstract class BackwardsCo

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
uschindler commented on code in PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#discussion_r1486879238 ## lucene/backward-codecs/src/test/org/apache/lucene/backward_index/BackwardsCompatibilityTestBase.java: ## @@ -47,25 +47,64 @@ public abstract class BackwardsCo

[PR] Change the links to Lucene's homepage in the DOAP file to https:// [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
uschindler opened a new pull request, #13097: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13097 This PR changes all references to the Lucene homepage from the DOAP file to use the canonic HTTPS link. P.S.: This cannot change the namespace links as they are identifiers in XML world. Al

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
dweiss commented on code in PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#discussion_r1486846219 ## lucene/backward-codecs/src/test/org/apache/lucene/backward_index/BackwardsCompatibilityTestBase.java: ## @@ -47,25 +47,64 @@ public abstract class BackwardsCompat

Re: [PR] Only track released versions in `oldVersions`. [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
uschindler commented on PR #13096: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13096#issuecomment-1939589434 P.S.: Unrelated to this issue here: we should update the doap file to use https links. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please

Re: [PR] Only track released versions in `oldVersions`. [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
uschindler commented on PR #13096: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13096#issuecomment-1939582769 > @uschindler I also have a bias against adding more dependencies on network resources, this is why I was thinking of the DOAP files since we have them in the repository: https://git

Re: [PR] Only track released versions in `oldVersions`. [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
jpountz commented on PR #13096: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13096#issuecomment-1939540968 @uschindler I also have a bias against adding more dependencies on network resources, this is why I was thinking of the DOAP files since we have them in the repository: https://github.c

Re: [PR] Only track released versions in `oldVersions`. [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
uschindler commented on PR #13096: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13096#issuecomment-1939421071 `@RmuirSays`: "yes please, lets not do the network. the smoketester can do that. In fact mike already wrote the code." -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. T

Re: [PR] Only track released versions in `oldVersions`. [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
uschindler commented on PR #13096: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13096#issuecomment-1939418280 See this issue for more insights to the "crazy logic": https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5936 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to t

Re: [PR] Only track released versions in `oldVersions`. [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
uschindler commented on PR #13096: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13096#issuecomment-1939413767 > We used to have logic to allow up to one missing file to account for in-progress releases: https://github.com/apache/lucene/blob/releases/lucene/9.8.0/lucene/backward-codecs/src/tes

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
uschindler commented on code in PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#discussion_r1486656215 ## lucene/backward-codecs/src/test/org/apache/lucene/backward_index/BackwardsCompatibilityTestBase.java: ## @@ -47,25 +47,64 @@ public abstract class BackwardsCo

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
uschindler commented on code in PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#discussion_r1486656215 ## lucene/backward-codecs/src/test/org/apache/lucene/backward_index/BackwardsCompatibilityTestBase.java: ## @@ -47,25 +47,64 @@ public abstract class BackwardsCo

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
uschindler commented on code in PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#discussion_r1486656215 ## lucene/backward-codecs/src/test/org/apache/lucene/backward_index/BackwardsCompatibilityTestBase.java: ## @@ -47,25 +47,64 @@ public abstract class BackwardsCo

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
dweiss commented on code in PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#discussion_r1486645486 ## lucene/backward-codecs/src/test/org/apache/lucene/backward_index/BackwardsCompatibilityTestBase.java: ## @@ -47,25 +47,64 @@ public abstract class BackwardsCompat

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
uschindler commented on code in PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#discussion_r1486640670 ## lucene/backward-codecs/src/test/org/apache/lucene/backward_index/BackwardsCompatibilityTestBase.java: ## @@ -47,25 +47,64 @@ public abstract class BackwardsCo

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
uschindler commented on code in PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#discussion_r1486637570 ## lucene/backward-codecs/src/test/org/apache/lucene/backward_index/BackwardsCompatibilityTestBase.java: ## @@ -47,25 +47,64 @@ public abstract class BackwardsCo

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
uschindler commented on code in PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#discussion_r1486632751 ## lucene/backward-codecs/src/test/org/apache/lucene/backward_index/BackwardsCompatibilityTestBase.java: ## @@ -47,25 +47,64 @@ public abstract class BackwardsCo

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
uschindler commented on code in PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#discussion_r1486628856 ## lucene/backward-codecs/src/test/org/apache/lucene/backward_index/BackwardsCompatibilityTestBase.java: ## @@ -47,25 +47,64 @@ public abstract class BackwardsCo

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
dweiss commented on code in PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#discussion_r1486550352 ## lucene/backward-codecs/src/test/org/apache/lucene/backward_index/BackwardsCompatibilityTestBase.java: ## @@ -47,25 +47,64 @@ public abstract class BackwardsCompat

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
dweiss commented on code in PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#discussion_r1486545976 ## lucene/backward-codecs/src/test/org/apache/lucene/backward_index/BackwardsCompatibilityTestBase.java: ## @@ -47,25 +47,64 @@ public abstract class BackwardsCompat

Re: [PR] Only track released versions in `oldVersions`. [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
jpountz commented on PR #13096: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13096#issuecomment-1939220460 We used to have logic to allow up to one missing file to account for in-progress releases: https://github.com/apache/lucene/blob/releases/lucene/9.8.0/lucene/backward-codecs/src/test/org

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
uschindler commented on code in PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#discussion_r1486539904 ## lucene/backward-codecs/src/test/org/apache/lucene/backward_index/BackwardsCompatibilityTestBase.java: ## @@ -47,25 +47,64 @@ public abstract class BackwardsCo

Re: [PR] Only track released versions in `oldVersions`. [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
jpountz commented on PR #13096: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13096#issuecomment-1939207592 More fixes are needed, I'm looking. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the sp

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
dweiss commented on code in PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#discussion_r1486535126 ## lucene/backward-codecs/src/test/org/apache/lucene/backward_index/BackwardsCompatibilityTestBase.java: ## @@ -47,25 +47,64 @@ public abstract class BackwardsCompat

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
dweiss commented on code in PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#discussion_r1486531645 ## lucene/backward-codecs/src/test/org/apache/lucene/backward_index/BackwardsCompatibilityTestBase.java: ## @@ -47,25 +47,64 @@ public abstract class BackwardsCompat

[PR] Only track released versions in `oldVersions`. [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
jpountz opened a new pull request, #13096: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13096 This would avoid test failures when a release is in progress. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
jpountz commented on PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#issuecomment-1939072225 @uschindler I have been blindly following the release wizard, I'll look into the failure in a bit and see how we can address it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Ser

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
uschindler commented on PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#issuecomment-1939064842 @jpountz fixed the duplicate `@Deprecated` but it still fails because it can't find v9.11.0. I have no idea how it handles the last version of a previous stable branch. For sure from

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
uschindler commented on PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#issuecomment-1938981480 > @uschindler i think it's because @jpountz added a new version on branch_9x I spoke to him already I think it breaks tests as well on the stable branch Yeah, I also see this on

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
s1monw commented on PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#issuecomment-1938967335 @uschindler i think it's because @jpountz added a new version on branch_9x I spoke to him already I think it breaks tests as well on the stable branch -- This is an automated messag

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
uschindler commented on PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#issuecomment-1938959760 Great! I haven't seen we use `//spotless:off` already and its enabled in the config. So I think this is best option here. This also allows the regexes for the script to not break sudd

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
s1monw commented on PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#issuecomment-1938895854 @uschindler this works. it's funky if one of the strings has a certain length it will allow the bock-like strucuture. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To res

Re: [PR] Add getter for SynonymQuery#field [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
AndreyBozhko commented on PR #13077: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13077#issuecomment-1938870965 Checks are failing due to unrelated error from 314c553bdce22bc1bc08e46b218691575c2287e0: ``` Deprecated is not a repeatable annotation type @Deprecated public static final

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
uschindler commented on PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#issuecomment-1938869700 I'd like for the reasons described before to enable this option: https://stackoverflow.com/a/76221803 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond t

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
uschindler commented on PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#issuecomment-1938862855 What's the exact problem with tidy? I think after adding the new version, we should run tidy to let it cleanup the code. I will check if there are some comment signals to ti

Re: [PR] Add getter for SynonymQuery#field [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
AndreyBozhko commented on PR #13077: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13077#issuecomment-1938846917 @mkhludnev Makes sense - I added a simple test. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL abov

Re: [PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
s1monw commented on PR #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095#issuecomment-1938803239 this fixes the release script but I can't get tidy to not wrap the array [here](https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095/files#diff-8946e557343c70aadb734c2f1bdceeed366f32c6f667ea75b89b8

[PR] Fix addBackcompatIndexes.py to properly generate missing versions [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
s1monw opened a new pull request, #13095: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13095 In #13046 several changes broke the addBackcompatIndexes.py script to properly add and test the unreleased version. This updates the script to again properly add the new version. Closes #13094

Re: [I] java.lang.AssertionError in backward compat tests ("failed to parse ... as date") [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
dweiss commented on issue #13073: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13073#issuecomment-1938791677 I'm not sure what you're referring to. :) Please feel free to tweak - I just wanted jenkins to quiet down because it started failing. -- This is an automated message from the Apach

Re: [PR] upgrade to OpenNLP 2.3.2 [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
jzonthemtn commented on PR #12674: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12674#issuecomment-1938717600 Thanks everyone involved in this! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the s

Re: [PR] Enable parent field in sorted bwc tests [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
s1monw commented on code in PR #13067: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13067#discussion_r1486142786 ## lucene/backward-codecs/src/test/org/apache/lucene/backward_index/TestIndexSortBackwardsCompatibility.java: ## @@ -82,14 +84,20 @@ public void testSortedIndexAddDocBl

Re: [PR] Fix test failure for TestDocumentsWriterDeleteQueue.testUpdateDeleteSlices [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
s1monw commented on PR #13089: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13089#issuecomment-1938622498 LGTM too. lets merge it @gf2121 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specif

Re: [PR] Make date parsing more flexible for linedocsfile (europarl, enwiki) [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
s1monw commented on PR #13075: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13075#issuecomment-1938619621 LGTM thanks -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsu

Re: [I] java.lang.AssertionError in backward compat tests ("failed to parse ... as date") [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
s1monw commented on issue #13073: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13073#issuecomment-1938617817 > @s1monw - some of those assertions added in https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13046 only hold for the built-in europarl. I fixed date parsing but I'm not sure how to deal with

Re: [PR] upgrade to OpenNLP 2.3.2 [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
epugh commented on PR #12674: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12674#issuecomment-1938615618 Thank you all for sorting this... It will make some things downstream in Solr much easier... -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, ple

Re: [PR] upgrade to OpenNLP 2.3.2 [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
cpoerschke commented on PR #12674: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12674#issuecomment-1938493400 Thanks @uschindler and @dweiss for reverting on `branch_9x` here! minor: pushed https://github.com/apache/lucene/commit/8bf10130e95c7b1b3da16606be0bf872c28fb6ed to remove the e

Re: [I] Contributing a deep-learning, BERT-based analyzer [lucene]

2024-02-12 Thread via GitHub
uschindler commented on issue #13065: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13065#issuecomment-1938448818 > > How can that be done? > > This is a question that is much harder to answer than I thought... Lucene doesn't have a tutorial/user guide. The only place I could think of