tylerbertrand commented on code in PR #12577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12577#discussion_r1332210752
##
gradle/java/core-mrjar.gradle:
##
@@ -29,20 +29,19 @@ configure(project(":lucene:core")) {
dependencies.add("main${jdkVersion}Implementation",
sourceS
tylerbertrand commented on code in PR #12577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12577#discussion_r1332210752
##
gradle/java/core-mrjar.gradle:
##
@@ -29,20 +29,19 @@ configure(project(":lucene:core")) {
dependencies.add("main${jdkVersion}Implementation",
sourceS
javanna commented on PR #12578:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12578#issuecomment-1728197364
> I assume you will remove the deprecated method in main branch and add an
entry to the MIGRATE.txt there?
Yes. but I'll open a PR against main to have people double check the chan
dweiss commented on code in PR #12577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12577#discussion_r1331954883
##
gradle/java/core-mrjar.gradle:
##
@@ -29,20 +29,19 @@ configure(project(":lucene:core")) {
dependencies.add("main${jdkVersion}Implementation",
sourceSets.mai
kaivalnp opened a new issue, #12579:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12579
### Context
Almost all [vector search
algorithms](https://ann-benchmarks.com/index.html#algorithms) focus on getting
the `topK` results for a given query vector. This however, may not be the best
javanna commented on code in PR #12569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12569#discussion_r1331266192
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/TaskExecutor.java:
##
@@ -22,18 +22,28 @@
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Obje
uschindler commented on code in PR #12569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12569#discussion_r1331117098
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/TaskExecutor.java:
##
@@ -22,18 +22,29 @@
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.O
javanna opened a new pull request, #12578:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12578
We have recently introduced a TaskExecutor abstraction, which is meant to be
used to execute concurrent tasks using the executor provided to the
IndexSearcher constructor. All concurrenct tasks shoul
tylerbertrand opened a new pull request, #12577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12577
### Description
Resolves `CompileJava` cache miss caused by `options.compilerArgs` input
difference.
Moved the `apijar` input file to a `CommandLineArgumentProvider` to apply
rela
javanna commented on PR #12569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12569#issuecomment-172724
I pushed new commits to address the latest review comments, thanks for all
the input. This should be ready now.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
shubhamvishu commented on PR #12183:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12183#issuecomment-1727782959
I have rebased the PR based on the changes in #12574. Could some please take
a look? Thanks!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message
vsop-479 commented on PR #12528:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12528#issuecomment-1727215669
@jpountz Please take a look when you get a chance!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
javanna merged PR #12569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12569
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
zhaih commented on issue #9660:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/9660#issuecomment-1727052393
@stefanvodita Seems the issue is resolved? I closed the issue, feel free to
reopen it
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please lo
javanna commented on code in PR #12569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12569#discussion_r1331266192
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/TaskExecutor.java:
##
@@ -22,18 +22,28 @@
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Obje
javanna commented on code in PR #12569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12569#discussion_r1331259326
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/TaskExecutor.java:
##
@@ -22,18 +22,29 @@
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Obje
javanna commented on code in PR #12574:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12574#discussion_r1331497358
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/TaskExecutor.java:
##
@@ -85,11 +85,24 @@ final List invokeAll(Collection> tasks)
throws IOException {
return r
kaivalnp opened a new issue, #12575:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12575
### Context
Vector search is performed in
[`AbstractKnnVectorQuery`](https://github.com/kaivalnp/lucene/blob/main/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/AbstractKnnVectorQuery.java),
where
javanna commented on PR #12569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12569#issuecomment-1727388144
> It might be worth using CallerRunsPolicy with a small queue in tests
sometimes, as this is an interesting case that will make tasks run in the
current thread.
Given that TaskEx
stefanvodita commented on issue #9660:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/9660#issuecomment-1727196480
Yes, it's resolved. Thanks, Patrick!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
zhaih closed issue #9660: ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException in ByteBlockPool
[LUCENE-8614]
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/9660
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
javanna opened a new pull request, #12574:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12574
TaskExecutor is currently package private. We have scenarios where we want
to parallelize the execution and reuse it outside of its package, hence this
commit makes it public.
Note that its co
jpountz opened a new issue, #12572:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12572
### Description
`IndexWriter#flushNextBuffer()` is a convenient way to control indexing
buffer sizes across multiple index writers. Unfortunately, it seems that it
only ever flushes DWPTs, and neve
javanna merged PR #12574:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12574
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
benwtrent closed issue #12570: Reading after Segment Merge fails for HNSW
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12570
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
javanna commented on PR #12183:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12183#issuecomment-1727419929
Hey @shubhamvishu heads up: I merged #12659 to address the deadlock issue
and opened #12574 to adjust TaskExecutor visibility outside of this PR.
Hopefully you are next going to be able
shubhamvishu commented on PR #12183:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12183#issuecomment-1727638896
> Hey @shubhamvishu heads up: I merged #12659 to address the deadlock issue
and opened #12574 to adjust TaskExecutor visibility outside of this PR.
Hopefully you are next going to b
gf2121 opened a new pull request, #12573:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12573
### Description
Recently, we captured a flame graph in a scene with frequent updates, which
showed that sorting deleted terms occupied a high CPU ratio.
Currently, we use JDK sort to sort
gf2121 commented on code in PR #12574:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12574#discussion_r1331468750
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/TaskExecutor.java:
##
@@ -85,11 +85,24 @@ final List invokeAll(Collection> tasks)
throws IOException {
return re
29 matches
Mail list logo
