jimczi commented on a change in pull request #444:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/444#discussion_r749986210
##
File path:
lucene/sandbox/src/java/org/apache/lucene/sandbox/search/MultiNormsLeafSimScorer.java
##
@@ -61,7 +63,14 @@
if (needsScores) {
fina
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17444070#comment-17444070
]
Feng Guo edited comment on LUCENE-10233 at 11/16/21, 7:43 AM:
---
zacharymorn commented on pull request #418:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/418#issuecomment-969846412
> Hi @jpountz @jimczi, when I was doing some more deep dive to see how this
PR can be improved further, I noticed a difference of field-weight parameter
passed to create`MultiN
zacharymorn opened a new pull request #444:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/444
# Description
Updated field-weight used in CombinedFieldQuery scoring calculation
# Tests
1. Added a new test from https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/418
2. Run `./gradlew cl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Zach Chen updated LUCENE-10236:
---
Description:
This is a spin-off issue from discussion in
[https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/41
Zach Chen created LUCENE-10236:
--
Summary: CombinedFieldsQuery to use fieldAndWeights.values() when
constructing MultiNormsLeafSimScorer for scoring
Key: LUCENE-10236
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17444254#comment-17444254
]
Zach Chen commented on LUCENE-10212:
No problem [~julietibs] ! Glad to be able to c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17444178#comment-17444178
]
Greg Miller commented on LUCENE-10062:
--
Here's the PR targeting 9.0: [https://gith
gsmiller commented on a change in pull request #443:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/443#discussion_r749715273
##
File path: lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/FacetsConfig.java
##
@@ -409,9 +410,26 @@ private void processFacetFields(
indexDrillDo
gsmiller commented on pull request #443:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/443#issuecomment-969362319
**NOTE**: I'm working on additional testing but hoping to get some early
feedback on this approach, particularly as backwards-compatibility is
concerned. I'll update with more tes
gsmiller opened a new pull request #443:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/443
# Description
In benchmarks, using numeric doc values to store taxonomy facet ordinals
shows almost a 400% qps improvement in browse-related taxonomy-based tasks
(instead of custom delta-encoding
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17444124#comment-17444124
]
Greg Miller commented on LUCENE-10062:
--
I'm posting a new PR now for adding this f
bruno-roustant commented on pull request #430:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/430#issuecomment-969337494
Woah, @jpountz your idea has a clear effect. It brings +(10 - 12)% perf,
compared without the top-k optim. And top-k optim adds another +3% on top (plus
it is still very eff
mkhludnev commented on pull request #2611:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2611#issuecomment-969325618
@jpountz I still not sure if i did it right.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
U
mkhludnev closed pull request #2610:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2610
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-u
rmuir commented on a change in pull request #264:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/264#discussion_r749671027
##
File path: lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/FacetUtils.java
##
@@ -81,4 +84,19 @@ public long cost() {
}
};
}
+
+ /**
+ * Det
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17444098#comment-17444098
]
Haoyu Zhai commented on LUCENE-10122:
-
OK, here's the new PR (with the back-compati
zhaih opened a new pull request #442:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/442
# Description
As mentioned in the issue, use NumericDocValues to store parent array
instead of term positioning.
Benchmark results available in JIRA, in short we're seeing a slight
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17444091#comment-17444091
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-10122:
-
OK I am convinced too – let'
bruno-roustant commented on a change in pull request #430:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/430#discussion_r749654605
##
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/IntroSelector.java
##
@@ -185,6 +204,115 @@ private void shuffle(int from, int to) {
}
mkhludnev commented on pull request #2609:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2609#issuecomment-969271708
Uhgg... Thanks, Adrien. I'm on it.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17444070#comment-17444070
]
Feng Guo edited comment on LUCENE-10233 at 11/15/21, 7:51 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17444070#comment-17444070
]
Feng Guo commented on LUCENE-10233:
---
[~jpountz] Thanks! +1 to remove the OffsetBitSe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17444029#comment-17444029
]
Arjen commented on LUCENE-9921:
---
Thanks, although this kind of issue can happen with any l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17444025#comment-17444025
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-9921:
-
Sorry you got jar hell because lucene has the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17444024#comment-17444024
]
Arjen commented on LUCENE-9921:
---
I know that.
I even fixated it in my build.gradle at 62.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17444016#comment-17444016
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-9921:
-
You can't just override the advertised depend
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17444011#comment-17444011
]
Arjen commented on LUCENE-9921:
---
If the window is closing on 9, I agree it would be too ri
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17443976#comment-17443976
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8739:
--
Side thought: it would be nice to use Proje
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17443972#comment-17443972
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-9921:
-
I agree, let's not rush this in close to a re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17443965#comment-17443965
]
Greg Miller commented on LUCENE-10122:
--
Yeah, +1 to moving to doc values. Even if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17443964#comment-17443964
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8739:
--
I ran your PR with the new stored fields be
Yannick Welsch created LUCENE-10235:
---
Summary: LRUQueryCache should not count never-cacheable queries as
a miss
Key: LUCENE-10235
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10235
Project: Luc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17443953#comment-17443953
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-10216:
-
I like this plan (extending
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17443934#comment-17443934
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-9921:
-
I think it's too late for 9.0 - too little te
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss resolved LUCENE-10234.
--
Fix Version/s: 9.0
Resolution: Fixed
> Add automatic module name to JAR manifests.
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17443919#comment-17443919
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10234:
--
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss reassigned LUCENE-10234:
Assignee: Dawid Weiss
> Add automatic module name to JAR manifests.
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17443918#comment-17443918
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10234:
--
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17443917#comment-17443917
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10234:
--
Co
dweiss merged pull request #440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/440
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...
jpountz commented on a change in pull request #430:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/430#discussion_r749462492
##
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/IntroSelector.java
##
@@ -185,6 +204,115 @@ private void shuffle(int from, int to) {
}
}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17443912#comment-17443912
]
Praveen Nishchal commented on LUCENE-8739:
--
I have created a pull request - [ht
jpountz commented on pull request #2607:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2607#issuecomment-969035659
@noblepaul Note that it should be backported to `branch_8_11` if you want
this change to ever be released.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
jpountz commented on pull request #2609:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2609#issuecomment-969034069
Also it looks like you missed backporting to `branch_8_11`. `branch_8x` is
essentially dead at this point since 8.11 is going the be the last 8.x minor
release.
--
This i
jpountz commented on pull request #2609:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2609#issuecomment-969033135
You need to move the CHANGES entry to 8.11.1 since the 8.11 won't have this
change.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17443902#comment-17443902
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-10233:
---
This is an interesting idea!
One drawba
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17443897#comment-17443897
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10085:
--
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17443895#comment-17443895
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10085:
--
Co
jpountz merged pull request #441:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/441
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr..
jpountz commented on pull request #440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/440#issuecomment-968952307
Please do!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
pquentin opened a new pull request #441:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/441
FieldValueQuery got renamed to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery but the test
wasn't renamed.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
dweiss commented on pull request #440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/440#issuecomment-968862647
This is what I'd like to add to branch_9_0 (and branch_9x), @jpountz . Can I?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
Dawid Weiss created LUCENE-10234:
Summary: Add automatic module name to JAR manifests.
Key: LUCENE-10234
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10234
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue T
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10233:
--
Description:
In low cardinality points cases, id blocks will usually store doc ids that have
the sam
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10233:
--
Description:
In low cardinality points cases, id blocks will usually store doc ids that have
the sam
mkhludnev merged pull request #2609:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2609
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-u
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10233:
--
Description:
In low cardinality points cases, id blocks will usually store doc ids that have
the sam
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10233:
--
Description:
In low cardinality points cases, id blocks will usually store doc ids that have
the sam
praveennish opened a new pull request #439:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/439
# Description
Lucene currently supports LZ4 and Zlib compression/decompression for
StoredFieldsFormat. We propose Zstandard (https://facebook.github.io/zstd/)
compression/decompres
60 matches
Mail list logo