dsmiley commented on pull request #2508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2508#issuecomment-857351201
I don't know what the point is in reaching into the response type to do an
instanceof check. Testing the values are returned and not ordinals is the real
important part. A
dsmiley merged pull request #2508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2508
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, pl
gautamworah96 commented on pull request #2247:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2247#issuecomment-857311496
> Once we iterate to a solid PR I am very curious how this helps facets
performance -- we can switch luceneutil over to this bulk API to test.
Today both `IntTax
thomaswoeckinger commented on a change in pull request #2508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2508#discussion_r647825585
##
File path:
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/facet/FacetRangeProcessor.java
##
@@ -774,6 +763,30 @@ public Long parseAndAddGap(@S
uschindler commented on pull request #174:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/174#issuecomment-857110715
With foreign API you can directly wrap arrays to compress and wrap as
MemorySegment and pass to foreign function (native MethodHandle). Jextract
parses header file and creates M
dsmiley commented on a change in pull request #2508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2508#discussion_r647761533
##
File path:
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/facet/FacetRangeProcessor.java
##
@@ -774,6 +763,30 @@ public Long parseAndAddGap(@SuppressWa
rmuir commented on pull request #174:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/174#issuecomment-857008732
@jpountz another alternative would be to build against the new JDK foreign
api? If we need to call out to some native code, maybe we should look at the
best available mechanism. From
uschindler commented on a change in pull request #177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/177#discussion_r647663449
##
File path:
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/MemorySegmentIndexInput.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,614 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
uschindler commented on a change in pull request #177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/177#discussion_r647663449
##
File path:
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/MemorySegmentIndexInput.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,614 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
uschindler commented on a change in pull request #177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/177#discussion_r647660649
##
File path:
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/MemorySegmentIndexInput.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,614 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
thomaswoeckinger edited a comment on pull request #2508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2508#issuecomment-856900350
> If some of those methods are only used in range faceting, perhaps it
doesn't make sense to support range faceting on an enum field any way? Thus
it'd be ok
uschindler commented on a change in pull request #177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/177#discussion_r647659344
##
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/MMapDirectory.java
##
@@ -231,55 +224,60 @@ public IndexInput openInput(String name, IOContext
jpountz commented on pull request #174:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/174#issuecomment-856964392
Right, zstd definitely outperforms zlib on large files, but when I tested
with Lucene stored fields, the difference wasn't very significant, which makes
me wonder that most of the
jpountz closed pull request #174:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/174
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please co
uschindler commented on a change in pull request #177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/177#discussion_r647656801
##
File path:
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/MemorySegmentIndexInput.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,614 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
uschindler commented on a change in pull request #177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/177#discussion_r647655671
##
File path:
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/MemorySegmentIndexInput.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,614 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
uschindler commented on a change in pull request #177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/177#discussion_r647655523
##
File path:
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/MemorySegmentIndexInput.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,614 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
jpountz commented on a change in pull request #140:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/140#discussion_r647654997
##
File path:
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/BaseTermVectorsFormatTestCase.java
##
@@ -667,43 +673,92 @@ public void testRandom() th
thomaswoeckinger commented on a change in pull request #2508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2508#discussion_r647648735
##
File path:
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/facet/FacetRangeProcessor.java
##
@@ -774,6 +763,30 @@ public Long parseAndAddGap(@S
rmuir commented on a change in pull request #177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/177#discussion_r647598763
##
File path:
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/MemorySegmentIndexInput.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,614 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundatio
msokolov commented on a change in pull request #177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/177#discussion_r647429868
##
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/MMapDirectory.java
##
@@ -231,55 +224,60 @@ public IndexInput openInput(String name, IOContext
c
thomaswoeckinger commented on pull request #2508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2508#issuecomment-856900350
> If some of those methods are only used in range faceting, perhaps it
doesn't make sense to support range faceting on an enum field any way? Thus
it'd be okay to t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17359411#comment-17359411
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-9905:
-
Commi
jtibshirani merged pull request #176:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/176
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, pleas
jtibshirani commented on pull request #176:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/176#issuecomment-856850849
Thanks for reviewing !
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the speci
cpoerschke commented on pull request #2509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2509#issuecomment-856844229
cherry-picking to `lucene-solr/branch_8x` and `lucene/main` and `solr/main`
branches is complete.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respon
cpoerschke merged pull request #2509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2509
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service,
cpoerschke commented on pull request #2509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2509#issuecomment-856829661
> good find
not my find, apologies, i could have attributed the find better in pull
request from the outset. updated now retrospectively.
--
This is an automated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17359391#comment-17359391
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-9653:
---
New Pull requests:
- JDK 16: https://gith
thomaswoeckinger commented on pull request #2508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2508#issuecomment-856795094
> If some of those methods are only used in range faceting, perhaps it
doesn't make sense to support range faceting on an enum field any way? Thus
it'd be okay to t
thomaswoeckinger commented on a change in pull request #2508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2508#discussion_r647471384
##
File path:
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/facet/FacetRangeProcessor.java
##
@@ -774,6 +763,30 @@ public Long parseAndAddGap(@S
thomaswoeckinger commented on a change in pull request #2508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2508#discussion_r647459338
##
File path: solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/schema/EnumFieldTest.java
##
@@ -592,6 +592,11 @@ public void testFacetEnumSearch() throws E
uschindler commented on pull request #177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/177#issuecomment-856778316
Linux Jenkins tests:
https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-jdk17panama-Linux/
Windows Jenkins tests:
https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-jdk17panama-Windows/
--
This i
dsmiley commented on pull request #2508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2508#issuecomment-856774500
If some of those methods are only used in range faceting, perhaps it doesn't
make sense to support range faceting on an enum field any way? Thus it'd be
okay to throw as be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17359333#comment-17359333
]
Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-9855:
---
I've not noticed this was reopened. Just
dsmiley commented on a change in pull request #2508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2508#discussion_r647383022
##
File path: solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/schema/EnumFieldTest.java
##
@@ -592,6 +592,11 @@ public void testFacetEnumSearch() throws Exception
uschindler commented on pull request #173:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/173#issuecomment-856682232
The JDK 17 version is now here: #177
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
uschindler opened a new pull request #177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/177
**INFO: This is a followup of #173: It's the same code base, but with API
changes from JDK 17 applied**
This is just a draft PR for a first insight on memory mapping improvements
in JDK 17+.
uschindler commented on pull request #173:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/173#issuecomment-856594835
Hi,
I am currently working on an Update to Java 17, where some changes occurred
(there is a new `ResourceScope` class that replaces `MemorySegment.share()`;
the good thing: Y
cpoerschke opened a new pull request #2509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2509
(Please note this pull request is for `lucene-solr/branch_8_9` branch and
after merge the changes would have to be cherry-picked to
`lucene-solr/branch_8x` branch and (I'm guessing) also `lucen
thomaswoeckinger opened a new pull request #2508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2508
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17359100#comment-17359100
]
Nam-Quang Tran commented on LUCENE-8118:
Update on my previous post: After some
dweiss commented on a change in pull request #175:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/175#discussion_r647179032
##
File path: gradle/testing/alternative-jdk-support.gradle
##
@@ -18,60 +18,60 @@
// This adds support for compiling and testing against a different Java
r
43 matches
Mail list logo