Re: [I] Consolidate FileIO [iceberg-python]

2025-03-01 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #310: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/310#issuecomment-2692483991 This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open for 180 days with no activity. It will be closed in next 14 days if no further activity oc

Re: [I] Consolidate FileIO [iceberg-python]

2024-09-02 Thread via GitHub
TiansuYu commented on issue #310: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/310#issuecomment-2325085196 Moving forward, I suggest that we choose only one interface, but make the choice of using which underlying implementation configurable (based on the fact that [both implementat

Re: [I] Consolidate FileIO [iceberg-python]

2024-08-17 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] closed issue #310: Consolidate FileIO URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/310 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscrib

Re: [I] Consolidate FileIO [iceberg-python]

2024-08-17 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #310: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/310#issuecomment-2295038585 This issue has been closed because it has not received any activity in the last 14 days since being marked as 'stale' -- This is an automated message from the Apac

Re: [I] Consolidate FileIO [iceberg-python]

2024-08-03 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #310: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/310#issuecomment-2267211195 This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open for 180 days with no activity. It will be closed in next 14 days if no further activity oc

Re: [I] Consolidate FileIO [iceberg-python]

2024-02-05 Thread via GitHub
kevinjqliu commented on issue #310: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/310#issuecomment-1927505635 I see. I was under the assumption that PyArrow could completely replace fsspec. But it seems like there are a few use cases where we would prefer fsspec. > fsspec is

Re: [I] Consolidate FileIO [iceberg-python]

2024-01-27 Thread via GitHub
Fokko commented on issue #310: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/310#issuecomment-1913318831 What would be your proposal? The [FileIO is an abstraction](https://tabular.io/blog/iceberg-fileio-cloud-native-tables/) layer to use different implementations for your needs. For