ZENOTME commented on PR #884:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/pull/884#issuecomment-2716708182
> > This is a hard limit in the server implementation. I am not sure about
the reason for this design, as I am not familiar enough with the specification
of iceberg.
>
> +1, I a
Li0k commented on PR #884:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/pull/884#issuecomment-2716700631
> This is a hard limit in the server implementation. I am not sure about the
reason for this design, as I am not familiar enough with the specification of
iceberg.
+1, I also encou
ZENOTME commented on PR #884:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/pull/884#issuecomment-2684472066
> I am not sure if this is a server issue or a client issue, more research
is needed.
Looks like it depends on the catalog. For list of snapshots remove, it will
apply to metada
TennyZhuang commented on PR #884:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/pull/884#issuecomment-2586030157
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/c7910bb401f7f7fd09010bede0d80f5d2164afd5/core/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/MetadataUpdateParser.java#L547
This is a hard limit in t
TennyZhuang commented on PR #884:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/pull/884#issuecomment-2586026257
I am not sure if this is a server issue or a client issue, more research is
needed.
If only one snapshot_id is passed, it can be successful.
```
table: TableIdent
