Re: [PR] core,api: Refactor code with `hasLiveEntries` [iceberg]

2024-10-29 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #9993: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9993#issuecomment-2445551655 This pull request has been closed due to lack of activity. This is not a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It is just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable. If y

Re: [PR] core,api: Refactor code with `hasLiveEntries` [iceberg]

2024-10-29 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #9993: core,api: Refactor code with `hasLiveEntries` URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9993 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the spec

Re: [PR] core,api: Refactor code with `hasLiveEntries` [iceberg]

2024-10-22 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #9993: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9993#issuecomment-2430545274 This pull request has been marked as stale due to 30 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 1 week if no further activity occurs. If you think that’s incorrect or this pull

Re: [PR] core,api: Refactor code with `hasLiveEntries` [iceberg]

2024-03-25 Thread via GitHub
dramaticlly commented on code in PR #9993: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9993#discussion_r1538353913 ## api/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/ManifestFile.java: ## @@ -177,6 +177,15 @@ default boolean hasDeletedFiles() { /** Returns the total number of rows in al