liurenjie1024 commented on issue #77:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/77#issuecomment-1813893291
Tracked in #96
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific co
liurenjie1024 closed issue #77: struct value design
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/77
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail
liurenjie1024 commented on issue #77:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/77#issuecomment-1760723094
> Another solution is pass struct type as another parameter when we need it,
e.g.
I prefer this approach. It's weird for me to store types with values, and we
can alway
ZENOTME commented on issue #77:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/77#issuecomment-1760655157
cc @JanKaul @Fokko @Xuanwo @liurenjie1024
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
ZENOTME commented on issue #77:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/77#issuecomment-1759997715
I find that our struct value didn't include type info. Do we want include
type info in it?
1. If we include info in struct, the struct value may look like
```
struc
ZENOTME opened a new issue, #77:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/77
Use lookup will make the memory cost if we have multiple struct with same
type.
One solve way is to use `Arc` in Struct. I try this design in
https://github.com/icelake-io/icelake/pull/136.