github-actions[bot] commented on issue #9514:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/9514#issuecomment-2597166592
This issue has been closed because it has not received any activity in the
last 14 days since being marked as 'stale'
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Gi
github-actions[bot] closed issue #9514: Enhancement of ViewMetadata
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/9514
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsub
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #9514:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/9514#issuecomment-2408755040
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open
for 180 days with no activity. It will be closed in next 14 days if no further
activity occurs.
szehon-ho commented on issue #9514:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/9514#issuecomment-1930451770
Hi @nk1506 , I think we can have a lazy consensus, if nobody objects then we
can go. Did you have any concern about adding the common interface ?
--
This is an automated message
nk1506 commented on issue #9514:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/9514#issuecomment-1929401076
@szehon-ho , regarding
[comment](https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9461#pullrequestreview-1864143069)
. that discussion is already happening here. But we haven't concluded yet.
pvary commented on issue #9514:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/9514#issuecomment-1899924625
> @nk1506 which particular methods did you have in mind that would make
sense to extract into `IcebergMetadata`?
@nastra: When managing tables and views in the catalogs we often
nk1506 commented on issue #9514:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/9514#issuecomment-1898718003
cc: @pvary
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To un
nk1506 commented on issue #9514:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/9514#issuecomment-1898660780
> @nk1506 which particular methods did you have in mind that would make
sense to extract into `IcebergMetadata`? I'm not sure this is something we'd
want to do. `ViewMetadata` is an i
nastra commented on issue #9514:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/9514#issuecomment-1898586485
@nk1506 which particular methods did you have in mind that would make sense
to extract into `IcebergMetadata`? I'm not sure this is something we'd want to
do.
`ViewMetadata` is an
nk1506 opened a new issue, #9514:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/9514
### Feature Request / Improvement
Motivation:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/8907#discussion_r1441986754
Currently there is no relation between
[TableMetadata](https://github.com/apac
10 matches
Mail list logo
