Re: [I] DOCS: Missing Docstrings in public API [iceberg-python]

2024-09-26 Thread via GitHub
sungwy commented on issue #1056: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1056#issuecomment-2377221051 Hi @askalik - yes, that'll be amazing! If you leave a comment on #1191 I can get that assigned to you -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond

Re: [I] DOCS: Missing Docstrings in public API [iceberg-python]

2024-09-26 Thread via GitHub
askalik commented on issue #1056: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1056#issuecomment-2377188386 Can I try this one? Just for clarification it looks like #1190 is completed, but #1191 is needed? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond t

[I] DOCS: Missing Docstrings in public API [iceberg-python]

2024-08-13 Thread via GitHub
sungwy opened a new issue, #1056: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1056 ### Feature Request / Improvement As we prepare for a major release, I think it would be great to hold our public APIs to a higher standard of documentation. Many popular public classes,