sungwy opened a new issue, #1056:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1056

   ### Feature Request / Improvement
   
   As we prepare for a major release, I think it would be great to hold our 
public APIs to a higher standard of documentation.
   
   Many popular public classes, methods and functions are currently missing 
docstrings.
   
   Here are some examples:
   
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/blob/e891bcddb1584c6b7a35b61537ab5802b514ec6d/pyiceberg/table/__init__.py#L1396-L1410
   
   
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/blob/e891bcddb1584c6b7a35b61537ab5802b514ec6d/pyiceberg/table/__init__.py#L1447-L1465
   
   I think that the Google style guide for [Comments and Docstrings is a good 
start](https://github.com/google/styleguide/blob/gh-pages/pyguide.md#38-comments-and-docstrings),
 as it has a easily human-readable format that includes description, args, 
returns and exceptions that is also Sphinx parse-able (if we ever decide to 
autogenerate API docs that way in the future)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to