24.03.2015, 12:15, "Scott Aron Bloom" :
> My biggest problem with webkit, is the TONS of dependencies it requires..
>
> My app is not a "web" app, we use it for embedded help.. In Qt4, it added 1
> or 2 dlls, in Qt5, we wind up having to include a large portion of Qt that my
> app really doesn'
: Re: [Interest] QtWebkit replacement status...
On Friday 20 March 2015 21:59:10 Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
> What is the status of Qt WebEngine?
>
> Meaning, is it stable enough, to replace qtwebkit on production
> quality applications yet?
>
> Lots of talk about it's the f
To: interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] QtWebkit replacement status...
Hi Scott,
On Monday 23 March 2015 15:00:16 Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
> Which version of Qt should I use? 5.4?
>
well, I currently use Qt5.4.0 with webkit since there recently have some
annoying bugs with the nsapi p
nsapi has no future. For PDF just use a JavaScript viewer instead if the
PDFs need to be embedded into a web page, like what Firefox does. If they
aren't embedded it wouldn't take much to have your code detect that the
user click on a PDF url and do something smart.
Ian
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12
I would love to hear some “official” input on this. Our project will be
migrating to Qt5 later on this year. One of our 3rd-party services is embedded
into our product as a webpage. That 3rd-party makes use of nsapi plugins.
Primarily for pdf viewing. We have then used QWebPluginFactory to
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Frank Hemer wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> On Monday 23 March 2015 15:00:16 Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
> > Which version of Qt should I use? 5.4?
> >
>
> well, I currently use Qt5.4.0 with webkit since there recently have some
> annoying bugs with the nsapi plugin been
recs@qt-project.org
> [mailto:interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs@qt-project.org] On
> Behalf Of Frank Hemer Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 8:14 AM
> To: interest@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Interest] QtWebkit replacement status...
>
> Hi Scott,
>
> On Monday 23 M
rest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs@qt-project.org
> [mailto:interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs@qt-project.org] On
> Behalf Of Frank Hemer Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 5:00 AM
> To: interest@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Interest] QtWebkit replacement status...
>
> On
On Friday 20 March 2015 21:59:10 Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
> What is the status of Qt WebEngine?
>
> Meaning, is it stable enough, to replace qtwebkit on production quality
> applications yet?
>
> Lots of talk about it's the future.. but I cant find on google, has it been
> fully replaced and fully
