On Monday 23 March 2015 15:28:46 Scott Aron Bloom wrote: > My biggest problem with webkit, is the TONS of dependencies it requires.. > > My app is not a "web" app, we use it for embedded help.. In Qt4, it added 1 > or 2 dlls, in Qt5, we wind up having to include a large portion of Qt that > my app really doesn't care about, except for webkit. > > Im hoping the replacement web engine has fewer dependencies.
Nope - its worse! The chrome has more dependencies after all. Frank > -----Original Message----- > From: interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs....@qt-project.org > [mailto:interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs....@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of Frank Hemer Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 8:14 AM > To: interest@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Interest] QtWebkit replacement status... > > Hi Scott, > > On Monday 23 March 2015 15:00:16 Scott Aron Bloom wrote: > > Which version of Qt should I use? 5.4? > > well, I currently use Qt5.4.0 with webkit since there recently have some > annoying bugs with the nsapi plugin been fixed. The browser pdf plugins are > a must for me (no alternative for using a pdf reader on end user systems), > so I must wait for webengine to provide a replacement for these ... on > devdays there has been mentioned that nsapi support is not planned to be > implemented so that makes me worry a bit ... > > Currently webkit works fine for me and due to the latest talk on the list I > expect it to keep working during the qt5 lifetime. > > Even compiling webengine took me very loooooong - just finding out about its > dependencies was a hell! For me it does definitely not feel like being > ready for production use. > > Frank > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs....@qt-project.org > > [mailto:interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs....@qt-project.org] On > > Behalf Of Frank Hemer Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 5:00 AM > > To: interest@qt-project.org > > Subject: Re: [Interest] QtWebkit replacement status... > > > > On Friday 20 March 2015 21:59:10 Scott Aron Bloom wrote: > > > What is the status of Qt WebEngine? > > > > > > Meaning, is it stable enough, to replace qtwebkit on production > > > quality applications yet? > > > > > > Lots of talk about it's the future.. but I cant find on google, has > > > it been fully replaced and fully working. > > > > > > The webpages I render in my app, are pretty simple, no media to > > > worry about. > > > > currently no support for nsapi plugins (adobe ...). > > > > Frank > > _______________________________________________ > > Interest mailing list > > Interest@qt-project.org > > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
