24.03.2015, 12:15, "Scott Aron Bloom" :
> My biggest problem with webkit, is the TONS of dependencies it requires..
>
> My app is not a "web" app, we use it for embedded help.. In Qt4, it added 1
> or 2 dlls, in Qt5, we wind up having to include a large portion of Qt that my
> app really doesn'
: Re: [Interest] QtWebkit replacement status...
On Friday 20 March 2015 21:59:10 Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
> What is the status of Qt WebEngine?
>
> Meaning, is it stable enough, to replace qtwebkit on production
> quality applications yet?
>
> Lots of talk about it's the f
To: interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] QtWebkit replacement status...
Hi Scott,
On Monday 23 March 2015 15:00:16 Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
> Which version of Qt should I use? 5.4?
>
well, I currently use Qt5.4.0 with webkit since there recently have some
annoying bugs with the nsapi p
nsapi has no future. For PDF just use a JavaScript viewer instead if the
PDFs need to be embedded into a web page, like what Firefox does. If they
aren't embedded it wouldn't take much to have your code detect that the
user click on a PDF url and do something smart.
Ian
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12
I would love to hear some “official” input on this. Our project will be
migrating to Qt5 later on this year. One of our 3rd-party services is embedded
into our product as a webpage. That 3rd-party makes use of nsapi plugins.
Primarily for pdf viewing. We have then used QWebPluginFactory to
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Frank Hemer wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> On Monday 23 March 2015 15:00:16 Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
> > Which version of Qt should I use? 5.4?
> >
>
> well, I currently use Qt5.4.0 with webkit since there recently have some
> annoying bugs with the nsapi plugin been
recs@qt-project.org
> [mailto:interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs@qt-project.org] On
> Behalf Of Frank Hemer Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 8:14 AM
> To: interest@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Interest] QtWebkit replacement status...
>
> Hi Scott,
>
> On Monday 23 M
rest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs@qt-project.org
> [mailto:interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs@qt-project.org] On
> Behalf Of Frank Hemer Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 5:00 AM
> To: interest@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Interest] QtWebkit replacement status...
>
> On
On Friday 20 March 2015 21:59:10 Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
> What is the status of Qt WebEngine?
>
> Meaning, is it stable enough, to replace qtwebkit on production quality
> applications yet?
>
> Lots of talk about it's the future.. but I cant find on google, has it been
> fully replaced and fully
What is the status of Qt WebEngine?
Meaning, is it stable enough, to replace qtwebkit on production quality
applications yet?
Lots of talk about it's the future.. but I cant find on google, has it been
fully replaced and fully working.
The webpages I render in my app, are pretty simple, no med
10 matches
Mail list logo
