Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine 5.15.3 tag

2021-03-09 Thread Benjamin TERRIER
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 22:41, Florian Bruhin wrote: > Hey Tuukaa, > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 09:24:23PM +, Tuukka Turunen wrote: > > I do understand the desire to have a supported / tagged release of QWE > > and it is possible that it might even work quite well on an earlier > > release of Qt

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine 5.15.3 tag

2021-03-09 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hey Tuukaa, On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 09:24:23PM +, Tuukka Turunen wrote: > I do understand the desire to have a supported / tagged release of QWE > and it is possible that it might even work quite well on an earlier > release of Qt. However, we are testing it in conjunction with the > other cha

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine 5.15.3 tag

2021-03-09 Thread Tuukka Turunen
käyttäjän Florian Bruhin puolesta Lähetetty: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 7:53:52 PM Vastaanottaja: Benjamin TERRIER Kopio: Qt Interest Aihe: Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine 5.15.3 tag On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 06:37:35PM +0100, Benjamin TERRIER wrote: > I am pretty sure that Linux distros which have Qt 5

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine 5.15.3 tag

2021-03-09 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 06:37:35PM +0100, Benjamin TERRIER wrote: > I am pretty sure that Linux distros which have Qt 5.15 would be interested > in upgrading their Qt WebEngine to 5.15.3+ They can - Gentoo did even before the release, Archlinux did after I asked them to do so and convinced them it

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine 5.15.3 tag

2021-03-09 Thread Benjamin TERRIER
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 18:07, Florian Bruhin wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:41:51AM +0100, Benjamin TERRIER wrote: > > I would not mind if it was just a matter of tag, but the fact that the > > change file for 5.15.3 (changes-5.15.3) is not present on the 5.15.3 > branch > > in the public rep

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine 5.15.3 tag

2021-03-09 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:41:51AM +0100, Benjamin TERRIER wrote: > I would not mind if it was just a matter of tag, but the fact that the > change file for 5.15.3 (changes-5.15.3) is not present on the 5.15.3 branch > in the public repo does not help making this branch trustworthy. That's no acci

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine 5.15.3 tag

2021-03-09 Thread Benjamin TERRIER
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 18:46, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Benjamin is explicitly asking for an exception. I support him: QtWebEngine > needs to stay up-to-date. > > Well, I am not so much asking for a new exception as I am asking for The Qt Company to enforce the exception Tuukka talked about: On

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine 5.15.3 tag

2021-03-04 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday, 4 March 2021 06:45:37 PST Tuukka Turunen wrote: > Hi, > > The plan has been not to tag the release in the public repo as part of the > commercial-lts phase. Benjamin is explicitly asking for an exception. I support him: QtWebEngine needs to stay up-to-date. -- Thiago Macieira - th

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine 5.15.3 tag

2021-03-04 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
On Donnerstag, 4. März 2021 15:16:27 CET Benjamin TERRIER wrote: > Hi, > > Given that the Qt WebEngine module is an exception to the commercial only > LTS support, > could we have v5.15.3 tags for https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebengine.git/ > and https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebengine-chromium.git

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine 5.15.3 tag

2021-03-04 Thread Tuukka Turunen
Hi, The plan has been not to tag the release in the public repo as part of the commercial-lts phase. Yours, Tuukka From: Interest on behalf of Benjamin TERRIER Date: Thursday, 4. March 2021 at 16.21 To: Qt Interest Subject: [Interest] Qt WebEngine 5.15.3 tag Hi, Given

[Interest] Qt WebEngine 5.15.3 tag

2021-03-04 Thread Benjamin TERRIER
Hi, Given that the Qt WebEngine module is an exception to the commercial only LTS support, could we have v5.15.3 tags for https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebengine.git/ and https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebengine-chromium.git/ ? Thanks Benjamin ___ Interes