On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 18:46, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote:
> > Benjamin is explicitly asking for an exception. I support him: QtWebEngine > needs to stay up-to-date. > > Well, I am not so much asking for a new exception as I am asking for The Qt Company to enforce the exception Tuukka talked about: On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 11:56, Tuukka Turunen <tuukka.turu...@qt.io> wrote: > With Qt 6.0.0 released and the first patch release (Qt 6.0.1) coming soon, > it is time to enter the commercial-only LTS phase for Qt 5.15 LTS. All the > existing 5.15 branches remain publicly visible, but they are closed for new > commits (and cherry-picks). Exception being the Qt WebEngine (and the > deprecated Qt Script), which have a 3rd party LGPL dependency. I would not mind if it was just a matter of tag, but the fact that the change file for 5.15.3 (changes-5.15.3) is not present on the 5.15.3 branch in the public repo does not help making this branch trustworthy. On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 17:02, Allan Sandfeld Jensen <k...@carewolf.com> wrote: > though at the moment that matches the head of 87-based. Is it good ? or bad ? or is this just a side note ?
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
