Re: [Interest] Building Qt5 with Intel C++ under Windows

2015-01-27 Thread Saether Jan-Arve
Arve Fra: interest-bounces+jan-arve.saether=theqtcompany@qt-project.org på vegne av Carsten Schneemann Sendt: 26. januar 2015 08:58 Til: interest@qt-project.org Emne: Re: [Interest] Building Qt5 with Intel C++ under Windows Hi Thiago, Thiago Macieira

Re: [Interest] Building Qt5 with Intel C++ under Windows

2015-01-25 Thread Carsten Schneemann
Hi Thiago, Thiago Macieira wrote: > It's a missing #include, it has to be. In fact a missing #define as it turned out... :-) To make the long story short: the problem was that the win32-msvc2013 mkspec has -DWIN32 in it whereas win32-icc doesn't. I'll write up the details under QTBUG-43778. May

Re: [Interest] Building Qt5 with Intel C++ under Windows

2015-01-25 Thread Carsten Schneemann
Hi Thiago, Thiago Macieira wrote: > It's a missing #include, it has to be. In fact a missing #define as it turned out... :-) To make the long story short: the problem was that the win32-msvc2013 mkspec has -DWIN32 in it whereas win32-icc doesn't. I'll write up the detail

Re: [Interest] Building Qt5 with Intel C++ under Windows

2015-01-23 Thread Carsten Schneemann
Hi Jan-Arve, thanks a lot for your suggestions. I agree that simply using MSVC to build just iAccessible2 should do the job, but I would keep that as a last resort solution (i.e. if it ever turns out to be more than a missing header or so) since it's... ugly, as you said. As far as I can see a

Re: [Interest] Building Qt5 with Intel C++ under Windows

2015-01-23 Thread Saether Jan-Arve
Jan Arve Fra: interest-bounces+jan-arve.saether=theqtcompany@qt-project.org på vegne av Thiago Macieira Sendt: 22. januar 2015 16:50 Til: qt-interest Emne: Re: [Interest] Building Qt5 with Intel C++ under Windows On Thursday 22 January 2015 09:46:27 Carsten Schneemann wrote:

Re: [Interest] Building Qt5 with Intel C++ under Windows

2015-01-22 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday 22 January 2015 09:46:27 Carsten Schneemann wrote: > Hi Emre, > > Well, there are not so many enlightening things to say. > > Intel C++ on Windows is not among the "supported platforms" for Qt 5: > http://doc.qt.io/QtSupportedPlatforms/index.html Correct. It's supported by me, on a b

Re: [Interest] Building Qt5 with Intel C++ under Windows

2015-01-22 Thread Carsten Schneemann
Hi Emre, Well, there are not so many enlightening things to say. Intel C++ on Windows is not among the "supported platforms" for Qt 5: http://doc.qt.io/QtSupportedPlatforms/index.html Which doesn't mean it can't be made to work. As far as I understand, Intel C++ and Visual C++ should in general

Re: [Interest] Building Qt5 with Intel C++ under Windows

2015-01-22 Thread Carsten Schneemann
Hello Thiago! Thank you very much; this is very helpful. It's also good to know that there is support for Intel C++ on Windows in the forums. I'll try to compile earlier versions of Qt5 and see if they break and if they do where -- maybe this will give a hint where the problem came from. I alr

Re: [Interest] Building Qt5 with Intel C++ under Windows

2015-01-21 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Wednesday 21 January 2015 08:36:55 Thiago Macieira wrote: > I haven't run into this error. I'll start a build in the background and see > if the accessibility code is compiled. But I won't have time to investigate > this until mid-February. The build broke, probably due to one of my 200 patches

Re: [Interest] Building Qt5 with Intel C++ under Windows

2015-01-21 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Wednesday 21 January 2015 10:52:43 Carsten Schneemann wrote: > Hi all, > > > has anyone been successful with building Qt5 on Windows with the Intel > compiler lately? Yes, as recently as last month, using ICC 15. Which is when I fixed an error that caused the QPA plugins to fail to link. Pl

[Interest] Building Qt5 with Intel C++ under Windows

2015-01-21 Thread Carsten Schneemann
Hi all, has anyone been successful with building Qt5 on Windows with the Intel compiler lately? I know that this is not an "officially supported" platform, so if it can't be done at all I would be happy to hear that and abandon the Intel compiler. The current Qt (5.4) builds mostly nicely exce