>The idea was simply that if you needed anything more than what was
provided by SimpleSource (you have access to get/set functions in derived
types), you have full control by using the Source object instead. I guess
I can see use cases where you want a read-only PROP, but want to set the
source di
Why does repc generate the SimpleSource version of the classes with only
private members, why not with protected members, is it a needed design
decision ?.
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/inte
Hi,
Actually I am using QtRO module in a distributed service like application,
where what I call a service is a QObject remoted over the network using
QtRO.
As far as I know QtRO support only TCP protocol without SSL. I want to
implement HTTP protocol in QtRO. In order to do that I want some guida
