>The idea was simply that if you needed anything more than what was provided by SimpleSource (you have access to get/set functions in derived types), you have full control by using the Source object instead. I guess I can see use cases where you want a read-only PROP, but want to set the source directly in the derived class. Are you doing something like this? Or do you have a different use-case?
>Honestly, we haven’t had a need for the members to be protected so far. Actually I have a need of setting the initial values of the remote object properties, without firing signals to replicas (I hooked the change event to a notification UI and I don't want to get the notification popup on replica initialization but on further changes), the only simple way that I can think off is to set the member variables directly without firing the changed signal so it don't get queued and fired when the replica is initialized. I don't know if this is the scenario implemented in QtRO ? or there is signals that are fired at the replica level when it is first initialized ?
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
