Hey,
just checking whether you are aware of the Qt for Small Business license, where
you seem to be eligible for?
https://www.qt.io/pricing/qt-for-small-business
BR,
Maurice
> -Original Message-
> From: Interest On Behalf Of Ben Cottrell
> Sent: Tuesday, 22 February 2022 22:45
> To: i
On 23/02/22 10:50 am, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022, Ben Cottrell wrote:
I would like to use Qt libraries that are statically linked into my binaries,
but the monthly license cost is too expensive, as I'm unemployed at the
moment.
Can’t you use the LGPL-licenced versions? The LGP
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022, Ben Cottrell wrote:
> I would like to use Qt libraries that are statically linked into my binaries,
> but the monthly license cost is too expensive, as I'm unemployed at the
> moment.
Can’t you use the LGPL-licenced versions? The LGPL has provisions
for static linking that ar
Why do you have to statically link?
Why not use the lgpl license and the dynamically bound libs?
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Interest On Behalf Of Ben Cottrell
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 1:45 PM
To: interest@qt-project.org
Subject: [Interest] Individual developer license is to
Hi,
I would like to use Qt libraries that are statically linked into my
binaries, but the monthly license cost is too expensive, as I'm
unemployed at the moment.
Is the license price negotiable for individual developers?
Thanks,
Ben Cottrell
___
I
