On 23/02/22 10:50 am, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022, Ben Cottrell wrote:
I would like to use Qt libraries that are statically linked into my binaries,
but the monthly license cost is too expensive, as I'm unemployed at the
moment.
Can’t you use the LGPL-licenced versions? The LGPL has provisions
for static linking that are possible to meet (if nontrivial).
Yes, I can provide at least provide object files to re-link with. At the
moment,
all my apps are opensource so I am already compliant with the GPL and
the LGPL.
As for closed source apps, I can only use code licensed with the LGPL,
and provide
object files to re-link with.
bye,
//mirabilos
However, it would be nice to have a commercial license to be able to use
Qt static libraries in
closed source software, and to also receive support from The Qt Company.
I will carry on statically linking Qt in my opensource applications.
Kind Regards,
Ben Cottrell
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
