Re: [Interest] Building strings with .arg() (arrrgh)

2020-03-05 Thread Constantin Makshin
Every `arg(numeric_value)` overload uses a temporary `QString` object to build a text representation of `numeric_value` needed by the actual placeholder-replacement function. Even `arg(QChar)` and `arg(char)` create single-character `QString`s and pass them to either `arg(const QString&)` or `a

Re: [Interest] WebEngine proxy whitelist

2020-03-05 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
On Thursday, 5 March 2020 20:57:06 CET Benjamin TERRIER wrote: > On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 at 19:56, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > > Could you write it as a pac-script? > > > > I think there are some Chromium command-line arguments too that can change > > the > > defaults, but I think a pac-script is t

Re: [Interest] Building strings with .arg() (arrrgh)

2020-03-05 Thread Elvis Stansvik
Den tors 5 mars 2020 kl 21:24 skrev Max Paperno : > > On 3/5/2020 3:11 PM, Elvis Stansvik wrote: > > Den tors 5 mars 2020 kl 19:26 skrev Max Paperno : > >> One thing for sure, since my benchmarks, from here on I will very much > >> prefer the "multiArg" version of .arg() vs. using multiple .arg()s.

Re: [Interest] Building strings with .arg() (arrrgh)

2020-03-05 Thread Max Paperno
On 3/5/2020 3:11 PM, Elvis Stansvik wrote: Den tors 5 mars 2020 kl 19:26 skrev Max Paperno : One thing for sure, since my benchmarks, from here on I will very much prefer the "multiArg" version of .arg() vs. using multiple .arg()s. Closing side note: There's a a nice Clazy diagnostic for that.

Re: [Interest] Building strings with .arg() (arrrgh)

2020-03-05 Thread Elvis Stansvik
Den tors 5 mars 2020 kl 19:26 skrev Max Paperno : > > > On 3/5/2020 10:20 AM, Benjamin TERRIER wrote: > > > > I believe Marc was saying that using QStringLiteral *inside* a .arg() > > call is an anti-pattern, > > and not that using .arg() *on* a QStringLiteral is one. > > > > Hmmm, good point, inde

Re: [Interest] WebEngine proxy whitelist

2020-03-05 Thread Benjamin TERRIER
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 at 19:56, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > > Could you write it as a pac-script? > > I think there are some Chromium command-line arguments too that can change > the > defaults, but I think a pac-script is the most flexible and universal way. > > This could be a solution. If PAC

Re: [Interest] WebEngine proxy whitelist

2020-03-05 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
On Wednesday, 4 March 2020 16:33:17 CET Benjamin TERRIER wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any way to set a whitelist of URLs for proxy in Qt WebEngine? > > In Qt application this is done by implementing > QNetworkProxyFactory::queryProxy() and returning NoProxy based on the query > URL. > > However, ev

Re: [Interest] Building strings with .arg() (arrrgh)

2020-03-05 Thread Max Paperno
On 3/5/2020 10:20 AM, Benjamin TERRIER wrote: I believe Marc was saying that using QStringLiteral *inside* a .arg() call is an anti-pattern, and not that using .arg() *on* a QStringLiteral is one. Hmmm, good point, indeed it could be read that way. There are two references to .arg() being

Re: [Interest] Building strings with .arg() (arrrgh)

2020-03-05 Thread Benjamin TERRIER
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 05:33, Max Paperno wrote: > > Then found the [HEADS-UP: QStringLiteral][2] post by Marc on the > development list and didn't feel so good about it anymore. Specifically > where he says that using it with .arg() is an "anti-pattern" but not in > any way that I can understand